User talk:Rehumanist: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 07:50, 12 April 2009

Welcome!

Hello Rehumanist, welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. cygnis insignis 03:10, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The read through the ref you have given to Carmen Lawrence's beliefs, it would be preferable if the source explicitly stated she was an atheist. I think it could also imply agnosticism, or humanism, it merely gives her opinion on organised religion. Maybe another ref clarifies this position. cygnis insignis 03:18, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Flag icons in the International reaction to the 2009 Victorian bushfires article

Please see Talk:International_reaction_to_the_2009_Victorian_bushfires. Merbabu still insists that we should not use flag icons on this page. Others consider otherwise. Please observe the discussion and provide your views, which now has gone to a RFC. Kransky (talk) 13:56, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

List of tallest buildings in Australia

Hi, just thought you might like to know, I have started a discussion at Mvjs' talk page here. --timsdad ^(talk) 01:18, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vision Brisbane image

Hi, I uploaded File:Vision Brisbane.jpg as we discussed, and you have gone and uploaded it again 13 minutes later at File:VisionBrisbane.jpg with different free-use rationale. As it's a duplicate, and it's a non-free use image, it will probably get deleted. --timsdad ^(talk) 07:29, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, what was I thinking?! It's not a duplicate image at all, they just looked similar (well, not to me now, but they obviously did). However, as it's under WP's rules for non-free criteria, it's fine, but it is orphaned so it will probably get deleted. --timsdad ^(talk) 07:41, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

hehe, yeah. it was strange when i added my version to the "brisbane vision" page, clicked preview, and noticed the caption had already changed for me to "An artist's impression of Vision when completed". does wiki now have an a.i. that knows which caption to add? :P but then i refreshed the page and noticed a similar but better looking pic had beaten me to it. so now mine's floating in limbo, and i don't mind if it gets deleted. Rehumanist talk 07:50, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

April 2009

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload new images, however, it appears that one or more of the images you have recently uploaded, specifically File:VisionBrisbane.jpg, may fail our non-free image policy. Most often, this involves editors uploading a copyrighted image of a living person. For other possible reasons, please read up on our Non-free image criteria. Please note that we take very seriously our criteria on non-free image uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. timsdad ^(talk) 07:44, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:VisionBrisbane.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:VisionBrisbane.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. timsdad ^(talk) 07:46, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 20: / Line 20: @@
 Hi, I uploaded [[:File:Vision Brisbane.jpg]] as we discussed, and you have gone and uploaded it again 13 minutes later at [[:File:VisionBrisbane.jpg]] with different free-use rationale. As it's a duplicate, and it's a non-free use image, it will probably get deleted. --[[User:Timsdad|<font color="green" ><b>timsdad</b></font>]] [[User_talk:Timsdad| <sup><font color="blue" ><i>(talk)</i></font></sup>]] 07:29, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
 :Sorry, what was I thinking?! It's not a duplicate image at all, they just looked similar (well, not to me now, but they obviously did). However, as it's under WP's rules for non-free criteria, it's fine, but it is orphaned so it will probably get deleted. --[[User:Timsdad|<font color="green" ><b>timsdad</b></font>]] [[User_talk:Timsdad| <sup><font color="blue" ><i>(talk)</i></font></sup>]] 07:41, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
+::hehe, yeah. it was strange when i added my version to the "brisbane vision" page, clicked preview, and noticed the caption had already changed for me to "An artist's impression of Vision when completed". does wiki now have an a.i. that knows which caption to add? :P but then i refreshed the page and noticed a similar but better looking pic had beaten me to it. so now mine's floating in limbo, and i don't mind if it gets deleted. [[User:Rehumanist|Rehumanist]] [[User_talk:Rehumanist|talk]] 07:50, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
 == April 2009 ==