User talk:Cygnis insignis
- 1 Archive
- 2 -- hunted for food in the 18th century?
- 3 Disambiguation link notification
- 4 autopatrolled
- 5 Dingo
- 6 Elephant taxbox
- 7 Move request on Thomas Keightley (historian)
- 8 Widow spiders
- 9 ygm
- 10 wow
- 11 Disambiguation link notification for October 24
- 12 ArbCom elections are now open!
- 13 have no fear
- 14 the call from the wild
- 15 ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
- 16 ArbCom 2017 election voter message
-- hunted for food in the 18th century?
Hi. Where did you obtain the following information: "Targeting of this species by the whaling industry, for food, is recorded in the eighteenth century". SaberToothedWhale (talk) 22:58, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
- Hi. From the ref you appeared to have found. I'm not sure whether the century error was mine, or whether MarineBio had corrected this later; I vaguely recall being unable to go back and fix some things (I was having some problems saving edits around that time). The edit was an after thought, I would have been focusing on the species in the Southern hemisphere,  Cheers, cygnis insignis 09:11, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Dave Evans Bicentennial Tree, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Department of Environment and Conservation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
User:Guillaume2303 suggested that you should receive autopatrolled rights, so your contributions are listed automatically as patrolled in New Pages--since the pages you have been writing seem fully suitable both to him and myself, this would enable the New Page patrollers to concentrate better on pages which are more likely to have problems. But I see that earlier in 2011 you requested not to have this right, so I don't want to change it unless you're willing. Please let me know on my talk page. DGG ( talk ) 18:47, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
Who is really going to look up the Dingo and not notice the missing taxobox like we have for every other animal? It's in the news, just so you know, so other editors may descend on this one. I'm sensing this is a very "touchy" article I've discovered, with two different articles for the same animal. I direct you to this: "The dingo is legendary as Australia's wild dog, though it also occurs in Southeast Asia." I tend to trust National Geographic over Wikipedia articles, generally. So, "The Australian Dingo is a free-roaming wild dog unique to the continent of Australia...", as the first sentence, doesn't look correct. It is not unique to the continent of Australia, and plenty of sources prove this. Why is the poorly-written other article (which has 13 references to the Dingo article's 134) worthy of the taxobox? Doc talk 07:21, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
- Note - BRD is a suggestion, really, a way to avoid edit-warring. I'm not at all sure what you meant with your edit summary of "User needs to include the *D* part of BRD, 1 taxon, 1 taxobox. Two arts are a mess, this isn't helping" when you reverted me. Now, if you leave that as your only discussion and do not address this, that ain't exactly in the "spirit" of BRD. I would like a decent explanation as to why there is no taxobox in this article. If you do not attempt to provide one, I will reinsert it, as it only improves the article. Take your time: but do please respond, when you have the chance. Doc talk 07:37, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
Please undo your second reversion of my removal of that taxobox. cygnis insignis 16:06, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
Move request on Thomas Keightley (historian)
As past editor to the article, you are encouraged to participate in the discussion at Talk:Thomas Keightley (historian) to rename Thomas Keightley (historian)→Thomas Keightley since requirements of usage and lasting significance under WP:PRIMARYTOPIC appear to be easily met. Also "Thomas Keightley (historian)" would seem to be a misleading label to many nowadays who recognize him as mythology/folklore writer primarily. --Kiyoweap (talk) 13:58, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed that back on March 8th of 2009 you created a redirect from Widow spider to Latrodectus stating "Ambiguous, misleading, and geocentric name: move as per KOJ, MF". I do not know what "KOJ" or "MF" stand for, and so am having difficulty understanding the reasoning behind the redirect decision. I am considering requesting a move of Latrodectus back over to Widow spider in accordance with WP:COMMONNAME, and have created an RfC on the talk page for Latrodectus but don't want to propose such a move without having discussed it with the relevant interested parties first. Can you tell me more about the decision back in 2009 and explain for me what "KOJ" and "MF" stand for? Thank you! --KDS4444Talk (August 21, 2014, 5:34 AM)
User:JarrahTree 12:01, 2 May 2015 (UTC) (aka sats)
great to hear from you, will check! give a call sometime! JarrahTree 23:09, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
mate, good to see you editing JarrahTree 02:13, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
- Just dipping my toe in to see how chilly it is, so a warm welcome from you is much appreciated. There are problems within the culture here that make contributing content proper a difficult process, I expend more effort on trying to ignore the political machinations of career wikipedians and warrior princesses. cygnis insignis 05:57, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
pls ring me - you still got my mobile number? JarrahTree 06:17, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
- Done [insert officious icon with big tick] :) cygnis insignis 08:46, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Done JarrahTree 09:00, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Australian Legendary Tales, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Athenaeum. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
have no fear
elizabeth quay jetty is indeed in my opinion an oxymoron the quay has on its west side a structure to cope with the swan river transperth ferries, for some reason people think it is a jetty, it is really just a part of the quay, rather than a separate structure, but hey, the edit wars about eliz quay and its development make it a bit of a ditch. hundreds of people walked around it at the weekend, just to see the affectations on the side of the ditch. dont let anyone fool you, there is not much to see. just watching the people (I did so on saturday and sunday nights by accident, I was utilising the indian restaurant that looks over part of it) is fun enough, watching people, taking selfies, looking at not much to see. but then wiser persons than I have created the article. JarrahTree 15:55, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
- I was worried that my favourite restaurant had disappeared ... thanks for putting my mind at rest. Perhaps the gubberment should have asked its unwitting financiers "how much would you like to pay?" for the redevelopment. I have no objection to the use of my monarch's name, just the wadjella scroungers she has let build their cementaries amidst sweeping plains of bitumen and green desert. Are the bull sharks given a berth at the jetty? Have the dolphins thought better of their return to the area? What about the eroding slopes of mount Eliza (no relation), any hope that that will be stabilised with more anzac memorials and 'short term' accommodation? cygnis insignis 17:17, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
- ahhrgh me hearty, the waiting room has ethiopian spelling, and a very mesopotamian accent, with a distinct possibility of the remains of jellyfish and discarded prophylactics. but then, we live in a very strange world. JarrahTree 01:11, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
the call from the wild
arrghh me hearty, you shoudda had enough salt spray to return here - four months, four months, does this mean me and my assistant need to return to your shores with trinkets or gifts or something or other JarrahTree 02:34, 9 October 2016 (UTC)