User talk:Fiziker

If you go in for argument, take care of your temper. Your logic, if you have any, will take care of itself.

—Joseph Farrell

Bigfoot kudos

Your recent edits seemed worth commenting upon. It's refreshing to see that a controversial article on my watchlist has had good edits made to it when I periodically check in to see how it's doing. DreamGuy (talk) 19:16, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. I've certainly noticed your edits to Bigfoot related articles; they were good. During the summer I tried bring the Bigfoot related articles to a higher standard but I haven't gotten around to giving pages like Evidence Regarding Bigfoot the work they desperately need. —Fiziker ^t c 22:14, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

Image tagging for File:Delaware Valley map.PNG

Thanks for uploading File:Delaware Valley map.PNG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:49, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Image tagging for File:Delaware Valley map.png

Thanks for uploading File:Delaware Valley map.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:39, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Re: Sasquatch2 blocking

 Done. Cheers, –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 04:57, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Good job. —Fiziker ^t c 04:58, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Infoboxes for mythical creatures

Can we have a bit more discussion before you change everything, please? --Hans Adler (talk) 22:13, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

I have responded on the talk page. There hasn't been any discussion for a while so I thought everyone was OK with this. —Fiziker ^t c 22:36, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

For me the result of the discussion seemed to be that no action was necessary. When you put the project template on the template talk page, my watchlist reminded me that I was planning to propose usage documentation. Therefore I started sighting the way the template is currently being used. I only realised what you were doing after posting the new thread. Thanks for stopping for now. I am slightly worried that the result of the discussion would be a bit prejudiced otherwise.

Unfortunately it's already about midnight for me now, so we may not come to a definite consensus before I go to sleep. I hope that's OK. --Hans Adler (talk) 22:50, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

That's fine. I notified the Paranormal project about the problems earlier today when I saw their request in the documentation. I expect it will take a while to come to a consensus, and even if no one responds we should probably wait a few days before taking action. —Fiziker ^t c 22:58, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

List of megafauna discovered in modern times

Along the lines of the lists we have been looking at, you might be interested in List of megafauna discovered in modern times. I've been trying to improve it, but its still poorly cited and I'm afraid its become a nexus for people wanting to add things in an unsubstantiated way to bolster crytozoological claims. Locke9k (talk) 22:51, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

I added that to my watch list a few days ago when I came upon it while assessing articles for WP:SKEPTIC. I have yet to really look at but I will in the future. Thanks. —Fiziker ^t c 22:55, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Good catch!

Good catch here! Thanks. -- BRangifer (talk) 06:21, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. —Fiziker ^t c 09:20, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Parapsychology

I reverted your edit to parapsychology because your edit summary was false no implication I'd seen at all —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.65.114.215 (talk) 03:21, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

If I recall correctly, the lead has a number of problems which I will take a look at when I have the time. What you wrote was POV because it implied that psychic phenomena exist. I am however, satisfied with including "possibility". I'll take a further look and comment on the talk page when I'm free to do so. —Fiziker ^t c 03:56, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Also, please put comments, which don't belong in an existing thread under a new heading. You can do this by clicking the + tab at the top. Thanks —Fiziker ^t c 03:57, 20 April 2009 (UTC)