Talk:Puyo, Pastaza: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m Tagging for a wikiproject using tag {{WikiProject Ecuador|class=|importance=|imageneeded=|in=|unref=|nested=}} |
|||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
== Puyo river == |
== Puyo river == |
||
I think that you need more information about de Puyo river, and the people who live near to Puyo |
I think that you need more information about de Puyo river, and the people who live near to Puyo |
||
==Fixing it== |
|||
I'm working on bringing the page up to a better standard; please bear with me. --[[User:The lifted lorax|The lifted lorax]] ([[User talk:The lifted lorax|talk]]) 06:58, 27 April 2009 (UTC) (living in Puyo.) |
Revision as of 06:58, 27 April 2009
Ecuador Unassessed | ||||||||||
|
copyvio & non-copyvio version
It appears most of this text is taken directly from this site: [1]. I need to find out for sure, but I guess that is not okay according to Wikipedia rules and thus should probably be reverted to its original short stub format? Mceder 22:11, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
- Actually, that's quite problematic (see Wikipedia:Copyvio), and a bit surprising that no-one has reacted, considering that above comment is several (!) years old. Better late than never, and I've now nominated the three major copyvio sections for deletion. These are marked within the text (visible within the text when editing the page). The remaining smaller non-copyvio sections should of course remain. RN1970 (talk) 08:11, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
non-copyvio version
I have started a new version of the page here, where only the non-copyvio sections remain. RN1970 (talk) 08:28, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Puyo river
I think that you need more information about de Puyo river, and the people who live near to Puyo
Fixing it
I'm working on bringing the page up to a better standard; please bear with me. --The lifted lorax (talk) 06:58, 27 April 2009 (UTC) (living in Puyo.)