User talk:98.232.58.2: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m Signing comment by 79.30.50.148 - "" |
|||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
hi i write something about the voice "human" of the killers, and u delete it, but my explanation it isn't also discussed in the discussion page? bye. |
hi i write something about the voice "human" of the killers, and u delete it, but my explanation it isn't also discussed in the discussion page? bye. |
||
M. |
M. |
||
: Yes. What you wrote was what Wikipedia calls "original research." That means it's something you think yourself. That's not allowed in Wikipedia. Even if in your mind you're sure it's true, it has to be proven. If you can find a source (like a band member or well-known writer) who says it, you can put that in, but it has to be proven in that way. You can read about that policy at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_original_research [[Special:Contributions/98.232.58.2|98.232.58.2]] ([[User talk:98.232.58.2#top|talk]]) 18:33, 27 April 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 18:33, 27 April 2009
April 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Thrilla in Manila has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. C+C (talk) 18:43, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
- The edit removed nothing. I moved a non-fight reference to "Rocky" to the last section and reinstated a properly added NPOV box. Please bring your issues to the Talk page if you want to discuss. 98.232.58.2 (talk) 19:27, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
- After reading the Huggle talk page, that may have been a bug in that software. If so, no sweat. 98.232.58.2 (talk) 19:27, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
HUMAN —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.30.50.148 (talk) 22:50, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
hi i write something about the voice "human" of the killers, and u delete it, but my explanation it isn't also discussed in the discussion page? bye. M.
- Yes. What you wrote was what Wikipedia calls "original research." That means it's something you think yourself. That's not allowed in Wikipedia. Even if in your mind you're sure it's true, it has to be proven. If you can find a source (like a band member or well-known writer) who says it, you can put that in, but it has to be proven in that way. You can read about that policy at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_original_research 98.232.58.2 (talk) 18:33, 27 April 2009 (UTC)