User talk:C+C

Welcome to Wikipedia

Hello C+C, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.

Happy editing! Outsider80^(talk) 00:47, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page
How you can help
Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

Revert

You just reverted Insulator (electrical). I would say that that was a good faith edit. Fahadsadah (talk) 17:34, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I do not understand what you mean. The person replaced the entire article with a single sentence. Two minutes previously, he also replaced it with "An insulator, also called a loser, is a material that has feelings ♥♥♥ Aww so sweet and im a hacker btw ppl >:D[." [1] --C+C (talk) 17:40, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work

Just like to give you a thumbs up and thank you for your work fighting vandalism here. Keep it up! :) - Kingpin13 (talk) 18:58, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!--C+C (talk) 18:59, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Concering the word penis

Just because an edit uses the word penis does not mean it is vandalism. I am trying to fix a fallacy of information on the Last Judgment by Michelangelo that comes from mistaken assumptions stemming from its pre-restored state. When a certain penis was painted over and changed the orginial intentions (and offensivness) of the work.

Anti-Vandalism Barnstar

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Thank you for your work fighting vandalism.. keep up the great work. Michael (Talk) 18:19, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hay

Hay why do you guys keep sending me warnings I don't need them I undid the edits so why do you all still think there bad. Thy aren't hurting Wikipedia so their is no problem. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nulledit (talk • contribs) 19:10, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Userpage

Why don't you have a userpage, C+C? Valerian456 ^{Hush, Rush} 09:12, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thrilla in Manila

You got a bit carried away with your reversion of Thrilla in Manila - the portion you thought was removed was moved to a more appropriate place. Also, the Citations and NPOV boxes were properly added, and if you cared to participate in the Talk section of articles you edit, were agreed by multiple editors.

Nothing was removed from the article.

Please read thoroughly, including the relevant Talk page, before insta-reverting. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.232.58.2 (talk) 19:08, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, it may have been a bug in Huggle. If so, no sweat. 98.232.58.2 (talk) 19:23, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Apology

I apologize if I reverted you by mistake on Frank Zappa, as I thought I was reverting User talk:204.39.36.130. So if I did revert you, I am very sorry. Regards, —Mattisse (Talk) 19:18, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Yamla (talk) 09:43, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]