User talk:Daedalus969

8:45 pm, 10 November 2024 (PDT)

Welcome to my talk page! I will reply on your talk page unless you prefer otherwise as usually noted on your talk page. If you are an anonymous editor, I will reply here. When leaving messages, please remember these easy steps: Use a descriptive subject/headline Use [[wikilinks]] when mentioning users and pages If you are continuing a conversation with me, please edit the relevant section instead of starting a new section Sign your post with four tildes ~~~~ to leave your name and date Please also note that I have a problem with dropping things, but I am working on it, and have made progress. If you are going to use {{talkback}} templates, date them, so they can be archived properly. Click here to leave me a message

Talkback

Hello, Daedalus969. You have new messages at Livitup's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

tb

Hello, Daedalus969. You have new messages at roux's talk page.

You can remove this notice at any time by removing this template.

Thanks for dealing with the vandalism at Troy Davis case

Just wanted to say thanks. Have a great Christmas. Josh Atkins ^{(talk - contribs)} has smiled at you!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Smile!

A Nobody^{My talk} has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend, Go on smile! Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Talkback on User talk:MathCool10

Hello, Daedalus969. You have new messages at MathCool10's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Re:User:AntiFetch

Hello, Daedalus969. You have new messages at MathCool10's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

"Spelling" Article

While I appreciate your efforts to keep the pages on Wikipedia clean, the edits I made on the "Spelling" article clearly were constructive. It stated that "Hercules" is a common misspelling of the "correct" "Heracles." This is factually incorrect.

Re:Science debate forums

Hello, Daedalus969. You have new messages at Download's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello, Daedalus969. You have new messages at Download's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

YouTube

Am I understanding that you received a comment on YouTube harrassing you about Wikipedia? If I'm reading that right, I've been in the same situation before. Hope somebody wises up and works this out. Grsz¹¹ 21:24, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page.— Dædαlus ^Contribs 21:28, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Not cool. I've been harrassed on both sites because of the other site. I had no clue who sent the YouTube comment though. Grsz¹¹ 21:27, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page.— Dædαlus ^Contribs 21:34, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

It's frustrating and kinda creepy, but when the names are the same there's really nothing anybody here can do. Grsz¹¹ 21:35, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page.— Dædαlus ^Contribs 21:37, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Free speech

Hey, as long as Wikipedia does not accept vast amounts of funding from the public trough, then I suppose you are correct. However, many private Universities and other sources support and enforce the 1st Amendment under the penumbra of government protections and rights. If anything, Wikipedia should err on the side of providing too much protection under free speech guidelines as set out clearly in our Constitution. (Peterbadgely (talk) 01:23, 23 April 2009 (UTC)) peterbadgely

Replied on your talk page.— Dædαlus ^Contribs 01:41, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

With all due respect, you warning is ridiculous

Just so Im clear, "reverting vandalism" in the comment section, which is seen here

"(cur) (prev) 05:34, 24 April 2009 Eugene Krabs (talk | contribs) m (4,987 bytes) (Final warning: Vandalism. (TW)) (undo)

is NOT a personal attack, but my use of the same word, "vandal" in response to someone who was editing my talk page inappropriately, and reverting things that I am correct to remove, IS a personal attack?

No, guy, that;s bullshit and, as soon as you read this post you'll realize it. I'm removing your asinine "warning" and will wait for your apology, which is the ONLY thing form you I'll allow on my talk page.

OR, I'll allow it ALL to stay when you warn the THREE people who wrongly called ME a vandal tonight.

You decide. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Blappo (talk • contribs) 06:21, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page.— Dædαlus ^Contribs 06:24, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

You STILL haven't answered my criticism of your incorrect point

You accuse me of a persona attack for something that is put in the comment history every day. You TOTALLY fail to explain why your condescending tone is a substitute for a response. You were proven wrong and try to silence me by conjuring up "personal attack" garbage from thin air.

Answer the question or admit you can't, this isn't going away. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Blappo (talk • contribs) 06:26, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. You do not have the right to attack anyone back, no matter the circumstances.— Dædαlus ^Contribs 06:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

He's been blocked a week, finally. Dayewalker (talk) 06:32, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page.— Dædαlus ^Contribs 06:36, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Troy Davis edits

I'm sorry for the edits that I made on Troy Davis case. I read through several of the sources to quickly and misunderstood them. I hope you realize my edits were still in good faith. However, I'm still trying to think of a way to make the Davis article less one-sided. Despite the fact I do think Davis should get a new trial, right now the court is going to the Supreme Court, and, until decided, we should respect their authority and article should not be biased either way. On that note, would it be okay to cite additional parts of the majority 11th Appeals Court descision to begin balancing out the article. JakeH07 (talk) 21:05, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost: 27 April 2009

• Book reviews: Reviews of Lazy Virtues: Teaching Writing in the Age of Wikipedia
• News and notes: Usability study, Wiki Loves Art, and more
• Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia Art dispute, and brief headlines
• WikiProject report: Interview on WikiProject Final Fantasy
• Features and admins: Approved this week
• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot II (talk) at 04:05, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

why?

why did you revert my edit on the MMA page? I was removing bad formatting. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.65.243.150 (talk) 18:26, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

are you joking? because of crappy formatting the text was in a box. learn what happens when you leave spaces. 116.65.243.150 (talk) 18:39, 29 April 2009 (UTC)