Jump to content

User talk:Daedalus969/Archive 14

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 10←Archive 12Archive 13Archive 14Archive 15Archive 16→Archive 20


Your Warning . . . I Ate It

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3APinkaxis51&diff=298866095&oldid=298866085 It shows up in the History but not on the page itself. -WarthogDemon 02:25, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

WD, users are allowed to rm warnings from their talk pages, this is taken as an acknowledgement that the warning has been read. Gwen Gale (talk) 02:37, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
I don't really see what this has to do with me.— Dædαlus Contribs 04:02, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Al Capone

The information on the Al Capone bio page is inaccurate. Would it be acceptable for me to edit the page if I provide verified sources ?Foreverprovence (talk) 07:01, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page.— Dædαlus Contribs 07:05, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
This is the sort of thing I was referring to in the above section. Someone seeing this section, has to go look on User talk:Foreverprovence to see what you said, and someone seeing the post there will have have to infer the the post there is about something posted here. Regards, Jack Merridew 08:32, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
Note that it's an acceptable (within guidelines) conversational style here to ping-pong. I think more and more people are trending away from it (as I have) but it's not "wrong". Just inconvenient. ++Lar: t/c 18:51, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
I agree that it's not wrong, but it is inconvenient. Cheers, Jack Merridew 09:38, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
Jack, if you have a problem with it, go talk to Gogo Dodo about it, that's where I borrowed it from.— Dædαlus Contribs 22:12, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
I don't know that editor and have not seen this issue with them; I saw it here and so I commented here. Regards, Jack Merridew 09:38, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
You don't know me either, so I don't see what the problem is. You're just following me around, as far as I can see. Closing any AfDs I withdraw, etc. Please stay away from me, and let other editors handle things. You have a clear and present bias against me concerning your dealings with me, as evidenced by past encounters. Please leave me alone.— Dædαlus Contribs 19:45, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 29 June 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 01:42, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Why?

You removed my comment and said that comments don't go there, but that whole section was specified, from the owner i might add, to leave comments regarding his work and our opinions of support or non support. You scrolled through 30 some comments to delete mine. Why? Did you hae a problem with what I said?--Obscure323 (talk) 19:49, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page.— Dædαlus Contribs 20:59, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
Thanks!--Obscure323 (talk) 21:03, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

just a note

This warning: [1] is probably the sort you'll want to avoid in future... it was placed 4 months after the last contribution by the user you warned, and as was pointed out by several posters, is rather harsh. I know you know that now... but it's something to keep in mind. That user's not been around since, but if they ever turn up again, you may want to apologise. Hope that helps. ++Lar: t/c 22:53, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page and made a note regarding the warning you were speaking of.— Dædαlus Contribs 00:19, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
(Refactored from User_talk:Lar per my policy) Re, your message, I should have looked into that a bit more, all I saw at the time was a user who was continuously uploading images without licensing information, with no stop in sight. I'll try to avoid doing such in the future.— Dædαlus Contribs 00:09, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
Nod. The odd thing about it though, was that the user hadn't done any uploads (or had any activity at all...) for 4 months at that point. I checked deleted (and oversighted) contributions as well, just to be sure I hadn't missed something in the contribs, and there were no deleted or oversighted contribs more recent than 4 months earlier. To be fair, that user strikes me as rather an odd case, Brion Vibber, our CTO, created a permission, and granted it to them, a permission never since given to any other user on en:wp that I could find. (which I just took away when Xeno asked about it(, which is why I noticed the message in the first place). Thanks for the follow up note to Heather... they may never come back but it was a good thing to do. (let's keep the thread here, ok? but I think we're probably done) ++Lar: t/c 00:42, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

G'day daed

hope you're good :-) - I thought I'd swing by after what I think was our first interaction over at AN/I in the thread you started about Jack bothering you. As you noticed, I don't think that was a good venue for raising your concern, and if I'm honest, I don't think you went about it in the best possible way - but I am most certainly well up for explaining to you why I feel that way, or having any sort of conversation, if you'd like. If you sometimes feel that folk misunderstand you, or you find that folk are getting angry, confused, irritated, or rude for reasons you feel are nothing to do with you - there may still be ways you can adapt and evolve your behaviour to smooth the path, not just for others, but importantly for you! - happy to chat if you'd like :-) Privatemusings (talk) 10:45, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

User talk:Frei Hans

Please consider toning down your last two posts here - with a block, an SPI and a RFC/U currently going, I don't think your comments will do anything but add to this user's sense of persecution and grievance.  pablohablo. 09:17, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page.— Dædαlus Contribs 09:22, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
Cheers - I think that's a better way of putting it.  pablohablo. 09:26, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
I came here to suggest the same thing. Don't let infuriating, frustrating editors get to you. Just disengage and edit somewhere else. --Stephen 10:28, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
Thank goodness you replaced this with something milder, because if you had let that stand I think there would be people calling for your head. But you should not have posted something that strident in the first place. It is way over the top, completely inappropriate, and completely unbecoming... please, please, don't let something like that happen again or you may find yourself blocked. Think before you post. Thanks. (as per usual, you can reply here, I will see it and reply in turn) ++Lar: t/c 11:14, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 6 July 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:25, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Sockpuppets

Hi Daedalus. I was wondering if you could help me confirm whether User:Dimitri Yankovich is a sock of User:Wapondaponda? He's already been blocked indefinitely by an admin, and I just want to make sure the allegation is correct. The editing pattern is certainly suspicious.

I'm also curious about how you track down different socks. I sometimes have suspicions, but I don't really know how to go about investigating. Can you give me some tips? ChildofMidnight (talk) 19:14, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page.— Dædαlus Contribs 09:54, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Frei Hans

You probaly want to put his recent behaivour on the request for comment for him, to show that he still is not listening.Abce2|Aww nuts!Wribbit!(Sign here) 09:30, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Speaking of which

You recently placed a speedy-deletion warning on his userpage - I can't see that he's been removing any speedy-deletion templates. Could you check your actions and apologise if necessarry?  pablohablo. 09:50, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page.— Dædαlus Contribs 09:54, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Cheeseburger

Please clarify "nevermind", or strike through statements where you see fit. Right now your position on the matter is unclear. NJGW (talk) 19:45, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page.— Dædαlus Contribs 19:47, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

Thank you Carrt81

Thank you very much for the fast response. Carrt81 (talk) 05:23, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

Carrt81

Rather than being a re-actionist, why don't you revisit Carrt81's talkpage and look at the whole story - especially the one where an admin warned him of his actions on my talkpage. I used courtesy and even told him he could do what he wanted with his talkpage. Look at the names and accusations he used in the link from the admin. In fact, here is the link [[2]], after reviewing the language and accusations there, you may see my concerns. And you are not an ADMIN, so next time you think someone is in "fear" as you describe Carrt81, remember his stalking comments from the link. I asked him politely to begin aknew and remove old issues, he didn't so I removed them due to the passing of time. What do you ask people who have black eyes, "What did you do to deserve that?". Fear - give me a break, he was the one who said he was going to make me his project!--Victor9876 (talk) 08:18, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page.— Dædαlus Contribs 20:17, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
You talk like you want to start a war - I don't scare, so stop the intimidation method. Review the actions taken on Carrt81's actions on the admin review page, then speak. As to WP policy, this may be a case where reponding on another users talk page may need to be changed in order to leave the flow of the conversations intact - so people like you don't come along and take sides without the aility to see the flow of the coversations and how they progress. You do want to be an informed contributor, don't you!?--Victor9876 (talk) 20:41, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
That was NOT an attack, it was an OBSERVATION!--Victor9876 (talk) 21:04, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
How are you interpreting the word? Do you know what it means even?--Victor9876 (talk) 21:05, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
You are the one who contacted me with threats and innuendos!--Victor9876 (talk) 21:08, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
Because it is a noun - not a verb! Where did you go to school?--Victor9876 (talk) 21:14, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
I probably shouldn't get involved, but I don't want to see a fight between two people get out of control :) Victor9876, it seems like you and Daedalus969 are having a big misunderstanding to me. I think it would be better if you both simply forget this incident and act like it never happened. He wasn't trying to attack you, simply inform you of policies, etc. At Wikipedia, it's encouraged that everyone participate to their heart's content, but respect the policies that are in place, too. Nobody, not even admins, make mistakes, and it's not expected that policies will be followed 100%. But when they're not followed, there's ways to correct that. That's all he was trying to do -- trying to make this a better place for all of us. --Mpdelbuono (talk) 21:16, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

Let's move on. Please don't contact me anymore. Thank you!--Victor9876 (talk) 21:22, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

Actually looking at your edit history Mr. Daedalus969, I would suppose you are the one who will be blocked soon. Youve made a lot of enemies and stepped on a lot of toes. Your talk page history has the evidence. A lot of upset people —Preceding unsigned comment added by A beast with claws (talk • contribs) 22:16, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

And you're saying that because...Abce2|Aww nuts!Wribbit!(Sign here) 22:19, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
Never mind I see. Not what you said though, Abwc.Abce2|Aww nuts!Wribbit!(Sign here) 22:22, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

WP:Areas for Reform

Might benefit from your insight. Collect (talk) 15:29, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

RFAR

Hi. See Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Jimbo_Wales.27_block_of_Bishonen. You have been mentioned quite a bit in this RFAR request. I am notifying you of it so you can comment if you like. You have not yet been made a party, but it is possible. — Rlevse • Talk • 22:12, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

And I'm just popping in to say your statement was well phrased and clear, and I for one appreciate that you addressed your own actions in a very responsible and mature way, without dragging in anything else. well done, sir. KillerChihuahua?!?Advice 21:25, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Reply

It seems you havent put the same meesgae on his page when he should of gotten it. he is vandalizing the page and removing much important info. -Little BIG mike 25 (talk) 04:27, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Well, you've been confirmed to be a sockpuppet of USEDfan, so, goodbye.— Dædαlus Contribs 03:31, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

Be specific

What did I do the second time???? LuLouLouis (talk) 20:03, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page.— Dædαlus Contribs 20:06, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

BQ

I was about to revert myself, but you beat me to it. :) I really don't get what's up with this thing. But basically you've got a series of socks who don't like "band queer" as a term, and they are using wiki guidelines about links as a pretext for removing it. But their real issue, from the beginning, has been objections to the term "band queer". I don't care one way or another, I'm not in a band, not queer, and not an Aggie at that, nor even a Texan. (A good thing, since all they have in Texas are "steers and queers", if you can believe An Officer and a Gentleman.) Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots 02:50, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Tanthalas is probably really irritated with me now, but I thought after BQZip01 made his change today that it was OK. Silly me. I'll leave it be until it gets settle. But I'm still turning the socks in. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots 03:04, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
Please do turn them in. I cannot possibly keep up with 3-4 new accounts daily. Thanks for the help. — BQZip01 — talk 04:25, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
Don't mess with Texas BB. Gwen Gale (talk) 02:52, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
Yesterday you were in Ireland, now you're in Texas. Or are you in the Irish portion of Texas? Or vice versa? Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots 02:55, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
Dublin, Texas and yes, I've tasted Dr Pepper and have even seen folks put peanuts in the bottle before drinking the stuff :O Gwen Gale (talk) 03:00, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
c.c— Dædαlus Contribs 03:02, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
Then Gwen must know why Ireland is such a wealthy country. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots 03:04, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
All the lurkin' flower faeries, I reckon :) Gwen Gale (talk) 03:13, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
Ain't no faeries in Texas, neither! But Ireland is wealthy, because its capital is Dublin every year, don'cha know. :) Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots
... ewwwww .... that's the best ya got? ... gotta be a "green"backs joke in there somewhere! — Ched :  ?  04:43, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
That's the best I've got tonight. It's been a long day, out on the back nine, er, the north forty. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots 04:50, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
Hey, what the hell, everybody's entitled to an off night. ;-) — Ched :  ?  05:17, 26 July 2009 (UTC) (actually, it wasn't really all that bad)
Probably no worse than the Irish seven-course meal. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots 05:24, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
LOL ... bag a chips and a 6-pack eh? Poor Daed, he's gonna come back and wonder "what the hell are you guys talking about? ... don't you have your own talk pages?" ... LOL — Ched :  ?  05:39, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Slow down with the semi-auto warnings

Re talk: I simply changed "Website" to "sebsite" by mistake, and changed it to the intended "website" around six seconds later. 32.171.96.197 (talk) 04:20, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

What is Your Definition of Vandalism

If you are using this quote. " There is no escaping reason, no denying purpose, because as we both know, without purpose, we would not exist. It is purpose that created us. Purpose that connects us. Purpose that pulls us, that guides us, that drives us. It is purpose that defines, purpose that binds us. " !!! ??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.212.5.225 (talk) 15:46, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

I have no idea who you are or what you want.— Dædαlus Contribs 20:35, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Why did you declined my request to delete my Wikipedia account? I will not use it further more, so can u please delete it?

98.112.57.132 (talk)JonasanRat7 —Preceding undated comment added 23:46, 27 July 2009 (UTC).

No, talk pages of users cannot be deleted, as they are a record of your previous behavior, should you come back under a different account.— Dædαlus Contribs 23:50, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 27 July 2009

Delivered by -- Tinu Cherian BOT - 08:39, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Daedalus969. You have new messages at Livitup's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

03:38, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

tb

Hello, Daedalus969. You have new messages at roux's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing this template.

03:38, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for dealing with the vandalism at Troy Davis case

Just wanted to say thanks. Have a great Christmas. Josh Atkins (talk - contribs) has smiled at you!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

03:38, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Smile!

A NobodyMy talk has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend, Go on smile! Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

03:38, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Talkback on User talk:MathCool10

Hello, Daedalus969. You have new messages at MathCool10's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

03:38, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Re:User:AntiFetch

Hello, Daedalus969. You have new messages at MathCool10's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

03:38, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

"Spelling" Article

While I appreciate your efforts to keep the pages on Wikipedia clean, the edits I made on the "Spelling" article clearly were constructive. It stated that "Hercules" is a common misspelling of the "correct" "Heracles." This is factually incorrect.03:38, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Re:Science debate forums

Hello, Daedalus969. You have new messages at Download's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hello, Daedalus969. You have new messages at Download's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

03:38, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Sorry

I didn't know I did it I thought I had the right time. I suppose the computer automatically tells you the right date I am new on Wikipedia talk and don't do it very much so I don't know how to do it very well.Captain Virtue (talk)03:38, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Orphan (film)

All I did, or rather thought I did, was remove the reference in Orphan about her real being 33, when, in the talk section that this is not true. How is that problematic?03:38, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Never mind missread the discussion section. Sorry—Preceding unsigned comment added by Largoss (talk • contribs) 03:38, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Please re-visit Sean Hannity page

Hi,

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Sean_Hannity#Requests_for_comment_on_inclusion_of_Sean_Hannity.27s_political_views_on_waterboarding

I believe you may have misconstrued my proposed edit to Sean Hannity's article. I would like to include a section on Sean Hannity's political views, which I believe is quite relevant for a political commentator (and common for all other political commentators I have viewed as of yet). My proposal was not to include Sean Hannity's volunteering to undergo waterboarding, which I agree is WP:RECENTISM. It is simply to include Sean Hannity's political views as a section, specifically waterboarding, which is an issue that will be covered in history books 100 years from now. I would like to establish a full "political views" section. If you have some argument against this I would enjoy hearing it.

Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stargnoc (talk • contribs) 00:31, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 3 August 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:51, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

No longer banned?

I note your edit here, and wonder if you can link me to a discussion rescinding this ban. Thanks. Risker (talk) 06:10, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page.— Dædαlus Contribs 06:54, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 10 August 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:09, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Friendly Question.

Hey there! I'm a bit new here, and I found your page through your picture of the hummingbird, which I have to say is astonishing. :)

Anyway, I ALSO liked the quote at the beginning of the page, and was actually intrigued by another quote from Smith, about humans being a Virus, and I decided I'd look at the code by "editing".

Now, my main question is this; when I click edit on your page, it showed warnings at the top of the edit box, and I was wondering if you created them, or if they were installed by an administrator?

Also, I was wondering about your "Status" button at the top of the page. I've been trying to set up my user page in a nice manner, and would appreciate some help on these.

Thanks! ^_^ WingedYoshi - NP 03:14, 11 August 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by WYNP (talk • contribs)

Replied on your talk page.— Dædαlus Contribs 04:47, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you very much. I appreciate you taking the time to help a newbie. My regards. —Preceding unsigned comment added by WYNP (talk • contribs) 04:24, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User talk:JaneZetaBond

User talk:JaneZetaBond, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:JaneZetaBond and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User talk:JaneZetaBond during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. — Dædαlus Contribs 21:09, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Block

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule at Jan Jananayagam. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Nja247 08:30, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

User was not warned and there doesn't appear to be an actual violation.

Request handled by: AniMatedraw 20:47, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.

Shadowgcat3

Yep. You said exactly the thing that needed to be said. Saying "my roommate went on and vandalized. I'll change my password and he won't do it again." doesn't justify unblocking, but justifies to keep the user blocked. I've made a statement responding to that at User talk:Shadowgcat3, but please feel free to respond here. Mythdon (talk • contribs) 03:12, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

Seaclub

I was ready to tag it for speedy deletion but it might be an acceptable article once translated. Do you know what language it might be?--The LegendarySky Attacker 05:57, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
I had another look. It has "Barcelona" and "Madrid" which leads me to think it is Spanish. But I suppose, if it is worth deleting it doesn't really matter, does it?--The LegendarySky Attacker 06:07, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

The Cow That Thinks She's A Horse

Looks like I wasn't the only one to think this was a sockpuppet. What do you think of my accusation? Mythdon (talk • contribs) 05:18, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page.— Dædαlus Contribs 05:23, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
Please come back to my talk page to discuss the investigation. My suspicions of sockpuppetry were correct. Mythdon (talk • contribs) 23:31, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

ANI SOCKPUPPET CONCERN.

The sock you were looking for was User:UkFaith more then likely.Hell In A Bucket (talk) 14:33, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 17 August 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 01:39, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Clarification

Please see: Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification#Request for clarification: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Ryulong (5). Thank you. Mythdon (talk • contribs) 19:33, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Report threat

I am aware they are (see my talk page history). It was in response to his comments. It is not edit warring. Thanks. –túrianpatois 22:23, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Warning left for Egyptian-King (talk · contribs)

I think you were a bit hasty here. He changed 'often' to 'some', but the sentence started with 'some' went to 'traditionally', then to 'often', and then to his 'some'. At some point a reference to the History Channel was added, but not only is that an unreliable source, it's also unverifiable - I just searched the site. Dougweller (talk) 09:55, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page.— Dædαlus Contribs 20:54, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Al Capone's father

Everywhere on Al Capone's artlicle has his father's name ending with an "e." I don't see how this is vandalism, could you explain yourself? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.137.134.26 (talk) 23:02, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

My mistake, I reverted myself, carry on.— Dædαlus Contribs 23:08, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

Alfa-Tsentr

It was created by Elalfa (talk · contribs). A few unregistered editors made changes: 186.83.202.58 (talk · contribs), 85.49.211.98 (talk · contribs), 190.176.145.86 (talk · contribs) and 189.155.82.10 (talk · contribs). Hut 8.5 20:06, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 24 August 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:42, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

CSDing of Irish Peers

I am a little concerned by your CSD tagging of the recent spate of "O'Brien" late medieval Irish Lords. While it may seem that someone is creating a family tree of articles, each on its own could arguably pass WP:POLITICIAN, as Irish peers were the major national legislators of the time (Irish House of Lords) also, being an Irish Peer is likely an "indication of significance" in terms of WP:CSD#A7. I'm not majorly concerned, but I would be pleased if you revisited the taggings. Cheers. Fribbler (talk) 00:47, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Hi

Sorry, I wasn't aware that users were allowed to remove warnings from their own talk pages. Won't happen again... though I do think that doing so confuses admins who might not be aware how many times a user has been warned before. GSMR (talk) 20:36, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page.— Dædαlus Contribs 20:43, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Green Sheet

Hey, Daedalus969? It's me, Green Sheet. Look, I'm really sorry about the proper nouns. I JUST DON'T LIKE YOU ANNOYING ME SO MUCH!!! But on the other hand, I guess you're right. I'm just not sure how things work. I'm still new at this Wikipedian stuff. I just thought it would look better like that. But now I know. However, I'll only captialize them if they're part of a name or title. If you want to leave me a message, just come to my talk page. Oh, and one more thing...thanks. Green Sheet (talk) 23:33, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Talk:Jimbo Wales

The good faith removal of {{ec}} from a talk page does not constitute a violation of policy. However, WP:TPO is very clear in stating "Do not strike out or delete the comments of other editors without their permission." Could you please explain why you deleted my comments? 69.117.250.169 (talk) 01:27, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

I re-added it. Please do not remove the (edit conflict) tag.— Dædαlus Contribs 01:58, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

My Jung changes

Dear Daedalus,

Please help me, or perhaps explain further why interpreting Jung's description of Hitler and his followers as 'drunk' and 'warlike' is considered 'original research'. If Jung used those terms positively elsewhere, I'd like to be pointed in that direction. Jung was a great scholar; he deserves at least to be supported with evidence when accused of so heinous a crime as Nazism.

Thanks for your time,

Gaz.

PS I think the wiki- is pretty good. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gary pratt (talk • contribs) 10:21, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page.— Dædαlus Contribs 18:33, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

Sockpuppet "news"

Please refrain from posting "news" of editor blocks to article talk pages, especially ones where they didn't influence an official process (AFD, RFC, etc.). //Blaxthos ( t / c ) 01:29, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page.— Dædαlus Contribs 01:32, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

Talk:Same-sex marriage

Hi, I know that you are a significant contributor to the article on Same-sex marriage, and that you have a dispute with TheFix63 over the lead section. Having looked at both sections, I find TheFix63's version to be more neutral than the existing version, as I explain in depth on the talk page, Talk:Same-sex marriage. You seem determined to revert any changes made to the lead until they are discussed, so I will not change it at this time. Instead, I eagerly await your opinion on the talk page. Thanks in advance for reading and considering my opinion! Rising*From*Ashes (talk) 01:56, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

Good call

As you see, the SPI was right on point. Niteshift36 (talk) 00:53, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

My talk page

Your edits of my talk page are unbelievable. You tell me that it's fine to, and in fact you yourself do, delete comments made by other users in open discussion, but you undo my striking of comments made inside an archive after archiving?! How does that work? ~~ Dr Dec (Talk) ~~ 01:50, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page.— Dædαlus Contribs 01:56, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
About the rmving of vandals, considering the topic at hand and the fact that the practice IS considered controversial, wouldn't it have been better just to let him revert it himself? Considering how much cross-fire there's been it's just antagonistic to keep rmving it at this point. He's even stated that he will rever if asked, just let it be for now... Soxwon (talk) 02:15, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
Daedalus, I suggest you stop reverting that edit. It is doing nothing but causing more animosity. –túrianpatois 02:21, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
Look Daed, can't it wait like 24 hours? Surely it won't cause the world to explode if it stays and he's allowed to calm down. Heck BB doesn't even care. [[ Soxwon (talk) 02:34, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Enough!

This is a general warning to all participants. No more editing at User talk:Declan Davis. Leave the issue alone until the next daytime for this editor, which will be (presuming that this account's autobiography is true) not before at least 08:00 UTC (09:00 xyr local time). This excludes reversions of disruptive vandalism. And that I strongly suggest be left to the administrators who have already been quietly RBIing this particular vandal across several accounts and pages. Blocks will be handed out to enforce calm, and will be timed to expire no sooner than 12:00 UTC. Uncle G (talk) 02:37, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Personal attacks ≠ vandalism

Regarding this edit, are you aware that as per Wikipedia's official Vandalism policy, personal attacks are explicitly not vandalism? — Kralizec! (talk) 02:53, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

  • I'm responding here because it is too hot in this room and I am tired. I was not aware of that, thank you for the note.— Dædαlus Contribs 02:54, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
  • For what it's worth, it's part of a pattern of disruptive vandalism, aimed at Baseball Bugs, that has been occurring across several pages, and that has been being quietly reverted, blocked, and ignored. The vandal decided to come into a bad situation that Baseball Bugs happened to be participating in and stir the pot a bit, and (as Baseball Bugs noted) several editors took the bait. Uncle G (talk) 03:28, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Thanks.

I really am trying to learn how to work all this Wiki stuff so please excuse me if I'm wrong in posting this here. Just wanted to say thanks for your response as to why my signature was considered fake. Is there anything else I need to do to make sure that I post things correctly?Quazza97 (talk) 23:42, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Request for arbitration filed

This is to let you know that I've filed a request for arbitration at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration#Scope of NLT concerning a case in which you have commented at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive560#Legal threats by Milomedes. I have not listed you as an involved party; should you, however, prefer to be considered involved, let me know and I'll add you to the list.  --Lambiam 12:10, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Oh please

That is besides the point. Another user took control of the talk page for my user. Want me to raise an ANI? Dracula the v.o.d. (talk) 01:57, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Threats won't get you anywhere, especially those that lack any base.— Dædαlus Contribs 01:59, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
It is "his" in the definition that he can remove stuff. Why start pointless conflicts? –túrianpatois 02:07, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
Please read all relevant material instead of commenting without any knowledge. I relayed that he can remove messages, I just clarified that it isn't his.— Dædαlus Contribs 02:10, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
That is beside the point. It is about one user taking control of another's talk page. WP:OWN is not relevant. Why did you leave a message on my talk page anyway. It is between me and another user. Dracula the v.o.d. (talk) 02:13, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
What goes on wikipedia is everyone's business. I left the note to alert you that the talk page was not yours, as you are a new user. However, as said, you are allowed to remove messages.— Dædαlus Contribs 02:17, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Daedalus969. You have new messages at Abce2's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Sorry Abce2|From the top now!Arggggg! 01:13, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 31 August 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 15:56, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Daedalus969/Archive_14&oldid=1142542883"