Electronic voting in the Republic of Ireland: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 02:45, 30 April 2009

In the year 2004, the Irish government undertook plans to introduce a nationwide electronic voting system for the local and European Parliament elections. The proposed change was under the supervision of Martin Cullen, the former Minister for the Environment & Local Government in Ireland.

In March 2004 the Government of Ireland established the Independent Commission on Electronic Voting and Counting at Elections to examine the proposed system.^[1] It was dissolved in 2006.

The Commission issued a series of reports reviewing the proposed system and comparing it to the existing electoral system.^[2]:

The Commission can recommend the voting and counting equipment as follows:

The voting machine and related hardware components are of good quality and their design, which is based on voting systems that have been reliable in use elsewhere for some years, has also remained stable since their adaptation for use in Ireland. Subject to some minor security and usability enhancements, followed by extended and rigorous testing once they have been so modified, the voting machine and related components can be confidently recommended for use.

The embedded software of the voting machine is also of adequate quality, requiring only minor modifications followed by further analysis to confirm its reliability.

The government has spent €52 million on electronic voting machines and spends €800,000 per annum to store the machines.^[2] The prime issue is the lack of verifiability by the absence of an audit mechanism or paper trail. The Taoiseach Bertie Ahern has defended the flawed system in the Dáil, bemoaning the use of stupid old pencils ^[3].

The voting machines bought by the Government from Dutch firm Nedap are in storage as the cabinet ponders what to do after the Commission on Electronic Voting said it could not recommend the system. Approximately €0.5m is expected to be spent improving the software. Ahern has defended the system despite public scepticism and opposition from within his own party^[4] on the basis that having spent the money, it would cause loss of national pride if the system were scrapped.

In October 2006, a group of Dutch hackers, including Rop Gonggrijp, showed how similar machines to the ones purchased in Ireland could be modified by replacing the E-proms with Nedap -Firmware with E-proms with their own firmware.^[5]

On 23 April, 2009,Minister for the enviornment Mr John Gormley announced that the electronic voting system was to be scrapped by an as of yet undetermined method, due to cost and the public's satisfaction with the current system.^[6]

References

External links

This Irish elections-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

[1] Independent Commission on Electronic Voting and Counting at Elections

[cev2-2] Second Report of the Commission on Electronic Voting on the Secrecy, Accuracy and Testing of the Chosen Electronic Voting System, 2004

[3] Dáil Éireann - Volume 625 - 17 October, 2006

[4] Scrap €52m e-voting system, says councillor.

[5] Nedap/Groenendaal ES3B voting computer, a security analysis

[6] RTÉ News - Electronic voting system to be scrapped (23/04/2009)

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{cleanup|date=January 2008}}
-In the year 2004, the [[Republic of Ireland|Irish]] government undertook plans to introduce a nationwide [[electronic voting]] system for the local and [[European Parliament]] elections. The proposed change was under the supervision of [[Martin Cullen]], the former [[Irish Minister for the Environment & Local Government|Minister for the Environment & Local Government]] in Ireland. The system that was created for the Irish Voters lacked [[Voter Verified Paper Audit Trail]]as specified by the government, and after a campaign by the [[Irish Citizens for Trustworthy EVoting]] (ICTE) and opposition parties in [[Dáil Éireann]], the government set up the [[Commission on Electronic Voting]] (http://www.cev.ie/) to examine the proposed system.
+In the year 2004, the [[Republic of Ireland|Irish]] government undertook plans to introduce a nationwide [[electronic voting]] system for the local and [[European Parliament]] elections. The proposed change was under the supervision of [[Martin Cullen]], the former [[Irish Minister for the Environment & Local Government|Minister for the Environment & Local Government]] in Ireland.
+In March 2004 the Government of Ireland established the Independent Commission on Electronic Voting and Counting at Elections to examine the proposed system.<ref>[http://www.cev.ie Independent Commission on Electronic Voting and Counting at Elections]</ref> It was dissolved in 2006.
-The Commission's report stated that it was unable to verify the accuracy and secrecy of the proposed system in the available time frame. Due to this statement the government was forced to postpone the introduction of the electronic voting system. Since the system was not used, many members of the public felt that the whole system was a waste of money.<br />
-However in July 2006, the CEV in their second and final report concluded that the use of the voting machines would be continued and used again on another date.
-<ref>[http://www.cev.ie/htm/report/download_second.htm Second Report of the Commission on Electronic Voting on the Secrecy, Accuracy and Testing of the Chosen Electronic Voting System, 2004]</ref>:
+The Commission issued a series of reports reviewing the proposed system and comparing it to the existing electoral system.<ref name="cev2">[http://www.cev.ie/htm/report/download_second.htm Second Report of the Commission on Electronic Voting on the Secrecy, Accuracy and Testing of the Chosen Electronic Voting System, 2004]</ref>:
 <blockquote>
-The Commission can recommend the voting and counting equipment as follows:<br />
+The Commission can recommend the voting and counting equipment as follows:
+*The voting machine and related hardware components are of good quality and their design, which is based on voting systems that have been reliable in use elsewhere for some years, has also remained stable since their adaptation for use in Ireland. Subject to some minor security and usability enhancements, followed by extended and rigorous testing once they have been so modified, the voting machine and related components can be confidently recommended for use.
-• The voting machine and related hardware components are of good quality and their design,
+*The embedded software of the voting machine is also of adequate quality, requiring only minor modifications followed by further analysis to confirm its reliability.
-which is based on voting systems that have been reliable in use elsewhere for some years, has
-also remained stable since their adaptation for use in Ireland. Subject to some minor security
-and usability enhancements, followed by extended and rigorous testing once they have been so
-modified, the voting machine and related components can be confidently recommended for use.<br />
-• The embedded software of the voting machine is also of adequate quality, requiring only minor
-modifications followed by further analysis to confirm its reliability.<br />
 </blockquote>
-The government has spent €52 million on electronic voting machines and spends €800,000 per annum to store the machines. Not only do the machines not work reliably[http://www.cev.ie/htm/report/download_second.htm], they can be interfered with to affect the outcome of an election. Also, the software proposed is inadequate for the task[http://www.cev.ie/htm/report/second_report/pdf/Part%200%20Index.pdf]. The prime issue is the lack of verifiability by the absence of an audit mechanism or paper trail. The [[Taoiseach]] [[Bertie Ahern]] has defended the flawed system in the Dáil, bemoaning the use of ''stupid old pencils'' <ref>[http://historical-debates.oireachtas.ie/D/0625/D.0625.200610170016.html Dáil Éireann - Volume 625 - 17 October, 2006]</ref>.
+The government has spent €52 million on electronic voting machines and spends €800,000 per annum to store the machines.<ref name="cev2"/> The prime issue is the lack of verifiability by the absence of an audit mechanism or paper trail. The [[Taoiseach]] [[Bertie Ahern]] has defended the flawed system in the Dáil, bemoaning the use of ''stupid old pencils'' <ref>[http://historical-debates.oireachtas.ie/D/0625/D.0625.200610170016.html Dáil Éireann - Volume 625 - 17 October, 2006]</ref>.
-The voting machines bought by the Government from [[Netherlands|Dutch]] firm Nedap are in storage as the cabinet ponders what to do after the Commission on Electronic Voting said it could not recommend the system. Approximately €0.5m is expected to be spent improving the software. Ahern has defended the system despite public scepticism and opposition from within his own party<ref>[http://www.timesonline.co.uk/newspaper/0,,176-2416486,00.html Scrap €52m e-voting system, says councillor.]</ref> on the basis that having spent the money, it would cause loss of national pride if the system  were scrapped.
+The voting machines bought by the Government from [[Netherlands|Dutch]] firm [[Nedap]] are in storage as the cabinet ponders what to do after the Commission on Electronic Voting said it could not recommend the system. Approximately €0.5m is expected to be spent improving the software. Ahern has defended the system despite public scepticism and opposition from within his own party<ref>[http://www.timesonline.co.uk/newspaper/0,,176-2416486,00.html Scrap €52m e-voting system, says councillor.]</ref> on the basis that having spent the money, it would cause loss of national pride if the system  were scrapped.
 In October 2006, a group of [[Dutch people|Dutch]] [[Hacker (computing)|hackers]], including [[Rop Gonggrijp]], showed how similar machines to the ones purchased in Ireland could be  modified by replacing the E-proms with Nedap -Firmware with E-proms with their own firmware.<ref>[http://www.wijvertrouwenstemcomputersniet.nl/images/9/91/Es3b-en.pdf Nedap/Groenendaal ES3B voting computer, a security analysis]</ref>
-<ref>[http://www.heise.de/english/newsticker/news/79106 Dutch citizens group cracks Nedap's voting computer]</ref> This is contentious as in the Netherlands, 10% of voting machines from the touch screen type manufactured by another vendor named SDU http://www.newvote.nl/ are abandoned in the November 2006 and March 2007 Dutch elections and the Dutch Government is to reintroduce paper ballots in those locations and to review the system in the other 90% of cases after the elections in November 2006.<ref>[http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2006/10/30/europe/EU_GEN_Netherlands_Voting_Machines.php Dutch government scraps plans to use voting computers in 35 cities including Amsterdam]</ref> <br>
-Revelations under the Freedom of Information acts in the Netherlands, reveal extraordinary actions by Nedap interests after the Gonggrijp revelations of faulty Nedap systems, to suppress bad publicity about  their system.<ref>[http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/03/17/foi_dutch/ Dutch FOI disclosures reveal the odd business of evoting]</ref>
+On [[23 April]], [[2009]],Minister for the enviornment Mr John Gormley announced that the electronic voting system was to be scrapped by an as of yet undetermined method, due to cost and the public's satisfaction with the current system.<ref>[http://www.rte.ie/news/2009/0423/evoting.html RTÉ News - ''Electronic voting system to be scrapped'' (23/04/2009)]</ref>
-On the 23rd of April 2009, [[John Gormley]] announced that the government would scrap their e-voting system.
 ==References==
+{{reflist}}
-<references/>
 ==See also==
 *[[Voting machine]]