Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jaycee Studios: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 19:47, 19 November 2005

Jaycee Studios

This page is vanity, strongly suspect that it was written by the author of the website. Very NN, google shows no pages link to it [1] and only only 9 websites have ever referenced it [2] Agnte 12:24, 13 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and fast Renata3 14:37, 13 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. - Dalbury (talk) 19:52, 13 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I have to admit a great deal of skepticism about any article where the opening sentence reads "NOTICE: On the contrary of what this may seem, it is NOT nonsense. It had taken a long time to put together this article, and it is still being made better." Unless solid evidence is presented, delete as unverifiable. Rossami 02:34, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a friend of the webmaster of jayceestudios.com, and I know the Wiki entry was made by one of her fans. The opening sentance to which you reffered was added when the wiki was taken down before for being 'nonsense'. -Mr Reaper, friend of Jaycee Pawman.

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 *'''Delete''' per nom. - [[User:Dalbury|Dalbury]] [[User_talk:Dalbury|(talk)]] 19:52, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
 * I have to admit a great deal of skepticism about any article where the opening sentence reads "NOTICE: On the contrary of what this may seem, it is NOT nonsense. It had taken a long time to put together this article, and it is still being made better."  Unless solid evidence is presented, '''delete''' as unverifiable.  [[User:Rossami|Rossami]] 02:34, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
+I'm a friend of the webmaster of jayceestudios.com, and I know the Wiki entry was made by one of her fans. The opening sentance to which you reffered was added when the wiki was taken down before for being 'nonsense'. -Mr Reaper, friend of Jaycee Pawman.