Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Armenia–Finland relations: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 23:27, 7 May 2009

Armenia–Finland relations

another random combination, neither country can be bothered accrediting an ambassador preferring to have relations from their own capital cities and not even via Moscow which seems logical. No state visits [1] Most relations happen in Armenia-EU or football context.[2] LibStar (talk) 07:06, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I'm going to go out on a limb here and state that if they haven't accredited ambassadors that's a sign that they don't think their relationship is notable, unless they had ambassadors and withdrew them over a spat or something along those lines. Drawn Some (talk) 07:16, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no third-party sources (or even first-party!) to indicate even a modicum of notability. - Biruitorul ^Talk 15:20, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This article is a very pretty way of saying nothing of notabiliy. --BlueSquadronRaven 15:57, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Excellent almanac entry. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 23:27, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 *'''Delete''' - no third-party sources (or even first-party!) to indicate even a modicum of notability. - [[User:Biruitorul|Biruitorul]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Biruitorul|Talk]]</sup></small> 15:20, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
 *'''Delete''' This article is a very pretty way of saying nothing of notabiliy. --[[User:BlueSquadronRaven|<font color="blue">'''Blue'''</font>]][[User talk:BlueSquadronRaven|<font color="#000078">'''Squadron'''</font>]][[Special:Contributions/BlueSquadronRaven|<font color="black">'''Raven'''</font>]] 15:57, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
+*'''Keep''' Excellent almanac entry. --[[User:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )|Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )]] ([[User talk:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )|talk]]) 23:27, 7 May 2009 (UTC)