Jump to content

Talk:History of Venezuela (1999–present): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
FairuseBot (talk | contribs)
File File:Puentellaguno.jpg in this article is not compliant with the non-free content rules
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
==Source==

What is the source for this? : "Damningly, it was later revealed that that announcement had been pre-recorded on the morning of the 11th – before the shooting had begun."
[[Special:Contributions/201.242.110.159|201.242.110.159]] ([[User talk:201.242.110.159|talk]]) 04:20, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

==Broken references==
==Broken references==



Revision as of 04:20, 14 May 2009

Source

What is the source for this? : "Damningly, it was later revealed that that announcement had been pre-recorded on the morning of the 11th – before the shooting had begun." 201.242.110.159 (talk) 04:20, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Broken references

There are a bunch of broken reference links in this article I can't find the original note text for. It was apparently split off of Hugo Chávez back on October 19 2005, and I did find some reference material there to repair some of the broken links with, but others were still missing. Anyone familiar with the history of splitting and merging on this subject and able to provide clues to track down the rest? Bryan 05:55, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Down to just one broken reference. It's probably one of the Carter Center ones on the main page, but I haven't looked at the contents yet to see which one. Bryan 05:49, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Presidency, why?

Why does this article article exist? Since when is it necessary to distinguish the president as a person from his presidency? Well, maybe Hollywood actor Ronald Reagen, but are there other good examples of this practice? Someone, please explain the meaning of this forking. Medico80 22:56, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't around when the article was split, but it looks to me like it's simply a way of breaking up an overly long article into chronological chunks. This article is about the time period during which Chavez is president, stuff that happened before then is still back in the main article and presumably stuff that happens after he's moved on to other things will go there too. Unfortunately it looks like a lot of material was left behind in the main article in the process, though, so it didn't reduce the size as much as it could have. Bryan 00:56, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Chavez led a bloody coup well before he was a President, so there are issues separate from his Presidency, but if Nelson Mandela can be written about in one article, it would seem that Hugo Chávez could. As far as I have been able to tell, a LOT of Hugo Chavez articles exist because they were spun off of the main article (which is HOPELESSLY too long, biased, suffers from dubious sources, and needs a major red marker), using Summary Style, when it was aiming for featured article status. Rather than ruthlessly getting rid of unnecessary, controversial, or poorly-sourced writing, it looks like it was moved into daughter articles. A lot of what is written in the too-long main Hugo Chávez article needs to be moved over to the Presidency article, so I don't think deleting the Presidency article would be productive -- but everything in all the articles needs to be edited, shortened, and better sourced. I personally believe this was a bad use of Summary Style, but since the main article is hopelessly too long, the daughter articles are needed. Sandy 01:01, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mudslides

Cut this from article:

Subsequent mudslides in 2000 left 3 dead.[1]

Not relevant to the 1999 referendum, it could be moved somewhere else but I think it can be left out JRSP 12:04, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Hugo Chávez (2000).jpg

Image:Hugo Chávez (2000).jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 23:38, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The image File:Hugo Chávez under arrest in Turiamo (2002) .jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

The following images also have this problem:

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --04:25, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  1. ^ Kriner, Stephanie. (Red Cross, 2000). "Flooding Returns to Venezuela". Retrieved 10 Jun 2006.