Wikipedia:Requests for feedback: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 02:02, 18 May 2009

Skip to the bottom

Requests for Feedback

Shortcuts

This page provides comments and constructive criticism about articles that you have drafted, created, or substantially changed.
This is not a general help page. To seek assistance or ask a question, see Wikipedia:Questions.
If you are seeking an outside opinion about a dispute, please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.
Please note that this page is patrolled by volunteer editors just like you and it may take several days to review your request.

Before you request feedback

There are certain things which come up again and again so it may help if you deal with them before requesting feedback:

Does your article have reliable sources? These are important in terms of both verifiability and notability.
Do you have a conflict of interest that may harm your ability to produce a neutral article?

If you would like a beginner's guide to these sorts of issues, take a look at the article wizard.

If you are unsure about how to edit Wikipedia articles, take a look at this tutorial.

For a more general discussion of writing your first article, see "Your first article".

How to post a request

Place a Wikilink, with the title of the page inside [[ and ]] - for example, [[User:Example/Lipsum]] or [[Cats]] - in the box below.
Click Click To Add Request
In the new article, Write a brief summary of your work or what in particular you need help with, but do not post the whole article here.
If you have rewritten an existing article, you may wish to provide a diff link from that article's history that shows your changes.
Check regularly for responses to your request; they will most often be made here.

↓ Post your request using the box below. Replace "Untitled" with a wikilink to your article - e.g. [[User:Example/Lipsum]] or [[Cats]] ↓

After Receiving Feedback

Check back here often, as you will receive a response here.
Respond to the feedback, either with a simple thank you, to ask for help with anything mentioned, or, after you've made some of the improvements, what they think of them.
Consider helping out here in the future - anyone can read up on what articles should be like and provide constructive criticism.

Are you providing feedback?

Please consider notifying the user whose article you are providing feedback for by placing a message on their talk page, so they will be able to read it in a timely manner and reply if necessary. You can use..
- {{Feedbackreply-sm}} A template asking the user to check back here and consider responding
- {{Feedbackreply-alt}} A more personal version of the first offering your help with developing, moving to mainspace, etc.

Click here to purge this page (For help, see Wikipedia:Purge)

The previous few days of requests are transcluded below. The pages for the past 20 days are: (click here to refresh)

Index of all requests for feedback

Template:Werdnabot

user :James W. von Brunn

How do I get user: James W. von Brunn on Wikipedia website. Also I have a letter from Professor Revilo Oliver pertaining to Willis Carto that I want to attach. ??????? James von Brunn (talk) 22:18, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Composite fermions

The article on fermions contains a subsection for composite fermions, and it is a general definition. In condensed-matter physics, the term composite fermion has a definite meaning unlike what is given on the fermion page. I created a brief article for this definition in my user space. I have also created a brief biographical article on an important physicist in the subject.

Would it be appropriate to have a disambiguation notice for the two definitions? I would appreciate any feedback on these articles, and any suggestions for them to qualify for full articles.

--Dm00 (talk) 22:33, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pentecostalism

I and a few other editors have substantially improved the article from the doctrinal point of view. However, the history sections are lacking and we haven't done much work there. I would like a review to give us a different perspective on what we should add, expand, remove, and/or rearrange. Thanks. Ltwin (talk) 04:27, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Adyar

I made some substantial edits to the page Adyar against the three problem areas - references, wikification, peacocking. I think I've kinda taken care of these. Can I get some feedback before I remove the tags? -SpacemanSpiff (talk) 02:02, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 23: / Line 23: @@
 ==[[Pentecostalism]]==
 I and a few other editors have substantially improved the article from the doctrinal point of view. However, the history sections are lacking and we haven't done much work there. I would like a review to give us a different perspective on what we should add, expand, remove, and/or rearrange. Thanks. [[User:Ltwin|Ltwin]] ([[User talk:Ltwin|talk]]) 04:27, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
+== [[Adyar_(Tamil_Nadu)|Adyar]] ==
+I made some substantial edits to the page [[Adyar_(Tamil_Nadu)|Adyar]] against the three problem areas - references, wikification, peacocking. I think I've kinda taken care of these. Can I get some feedback before I remove the tags? -[[User:Spaceman7Spiff|SpacemanSpiff]] ([[User talk:Spaceman7Spiff|talk]]) 02:02, 18 May 2009 (UTC)