Jump to content

User talk:Newlivingmagazine: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
suggestion
Line 36: Line 36:
PS, I read your "conflict of interest" page and totally understand where you're coming from and how submitting certain kinds of material to Wikipedia can cause problems, so I know what and what not to do. For example, I wanted to contribute an article on "Colloidal Silver" and its "Health Benefits" in relation to helping to fight the "Swine Flu" and had reseaarch articles to cite on the subject. I was not going to promote any products, just strictly provide information. Hope that clarifies my intentions.[[User:Newlivingmagazine|Newlivingmagazine]] ([[User talk:Newlivingmagazine#top|talk]]) 02:19, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
PS, I read your "conflict of interest" page and totally understand where you're coming from and how submitting certain kinds of material to Wikipedia can cause problems, so I know what and what not to do. For example, I wanted to contribute an article on "Colloidal Silver" and its "Health Benefits" in relation to helping to fight the "Swine Flu" and had reseaarch articles to cite on the subject. I was not going to promote any products, just strictly provide information. Hope that clarifies my intentions.[[User:Newlivingmagazine|Newlivingmagazine]] ([[User talk:Newlivingmagazine#top|talk]]) 02:19, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
:You should create a new, personal account and forget about this one. I recommend that you disclose the fact that you are affiliated with New Living on your new User page, and/or just avoid doing edits that could be seen as promotional for New Living (the way I'd go). It is definitely allowed for you to create a new account, especially if your old username could have been seen as promotional. Add the {{tlx|helpme}} template back to this page if you need help in doing this. Regarding collodial silver, I'd suggest that you ensure that you review the guidelines at [[Wikipedia:Verifiability]] as that is a very controversial topic and the quality of the sources will have to be very high. Thanks. [[User:Gigs|Gigs]] ([[User talk:Gigs|talk]]) 02:23, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
:You should create a new, personal account and forget about this one. I recommend that you disclose the fact that you are affiliated with New Living on your new User page, and/or just avoid doing edits that could be seen as promotional for New Living (the way I'd go). It is definitely allowed for you to create a new account, especially if your old username could have been seen as promotional. Add the {{tlx|helpme}} template back to this page if you need help in doing this. Regarding collodial silver, I'd suggest that you ensure that you review the guidelines at [[Wikipedia:Verifiability]] as that is a very controversial topic and the quality of the sources will have to be very high. Thanks. [[User:Gigs|Gigs]] ([[User talk:Gigs|talk]]) 02:23, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
{{tlx|helpme}}
I can not create a new user account until my IP address is unblocked. Seems User:Juliancolton who indefinitely blocked me is very unforgiving. Can you please help me? That's what my cry for help is all about. Thanks for the feedback on colloidal silver you are right on that, but I do have some reliable unbiased scientific studies I can reference.

Revision as of 02:33, 1 June 2009

Your account has been blocked from editing Wikipedia, because it appears to be mainly intended or used for promotional purposes of a company or group. See Wikipedia:FAQ/Organization and Wikipedia:Conflict of interest.

In addition, accounts are for individuals only, not for companies or groups or other collective editing, and your username should reflect this.

Wikipedia is not a promotion website; this kind of activity is considered spam on Wikipedia, and forbidden by policies, and usernames that appear to be promotional also violate our username policy. Editing on Wikipedia is not intended to be used to promote anyone, or anything, and its use for that purpose will result in blocking of the account involved.

If you feel that there has been a mistake, please appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} on your user talk page or contacting the administrator who has blocked you. Your reason should include a clear response to this issue and a new username you wish to adopt that does not violate our username policy. Please check that your new username has not already been taken here. –Juliancolton | Talk 21:49, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]


How does speedy deletion work?

{{adminhelp}} When I signed up and created an account for Wikipedia, it said, don't use your personal name, so I used my company name. I did not intend to be self promotional. You have listings for the New Living Bible, why not a listing for a New Living Magazine? My content is worthy of perusal. I am not trying to sell anything since the publication is freely distributed. What do I need to do in order not to get deleted? Thanks for your help --Newlivingmagazine (talk) 22:15, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm changing the tag to {{adminhelp}}.--Cubs197 (talk) 22:31, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article has already been deleted, with the reason, "Unambiguous advertising or promotion". The policy that we have all decided about that sort of thing is in WP:CSD.
Please read the above notice, which explains why your account has been blocked, and what action you can take to resolve this.  Chzz  ►  22:37, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am truly sorry I didn't meet your requirements and the self-promotion wasn't intentional. It was meant to be informational. You list other publications in your search terms. Was it that I did not follow your formatting guidelines? Also, since you blocked my IP address which is kind of a drastic punishment, how am I supposed to correct the error so I can get myself properly listed like the other publications in your encyclopedia??

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Newlivingmagazine (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

PS, I just read your WP:CSD and tried to send an email to: unblock-en-llists.wikimedia.org explaining that I wanted to fix the problem I created and the email is invalid. Maybe you can tell me what other steps I can take so I can correct the problem? It's a little hard when you block my IP address. I'd like to create a new non self-promotional user ID so I can list my article properly. Also, many of the other publications listed do not have verifiable information, meaning they have links that lead to nowhere, nothing backing them up.

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=PS, I just read your [[WP:CSD]] and tried to send an email to: unblock-en-llists.wikimedia.org explaining that I wanted to fix the problem I created and the email is invalid. Maybe you can tell me what other steps I can take so I can correct the problem? It's a little hard when you block my IP address. I'd like to create a new non self-promotional user ID so I can list my article properly. Also, many of the other publications listed do not have verifiable information, meaning they have links that lead to nowhere, nothing backing them up. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=PS, I just read your [[WP:CSD]] and tried to send an email to: unblock-en-llists.wikimedia.org explaining that I wanted to fix the problem I created and the email is invalid. Maybe you can tell me what other steps I can take so I can correct the problem? It's a little hard when you block my IP address. I'd like to create a new non self-promotional user ID so I can list my article properly. Also, many of the other publications listed do not have verifiable information, meaning they have links that lead to nowhere, nothing backing them up. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=PS, I just read your [[WP:CSD]] and tried to send an email to: unblock-en-llists.wikimedia.org explaining that I wanted to fix the problem I created and the email is invalid. Maybe you can tell me what other steps I can take so I can correct the problem? It's a little hard when you block my IP address. I'd like to create a new non self-promotional user ID so I can list my article properly. Also, many of the other publications listed do not have verifiable information, meaning they have links that lead to nowhere, nothing backing them up. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

PS is there any reason why the initial administrator who blocked my account blocked me "indefinitely?" I read that the initial administrator can stick with this decision indefinitely? What recourse is there then to correct my mistake? Newlivingmagazine (talk) 01:02, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

{{helpme}} I don't know why you suggest I contact User:Juliancolton to appeal to this person to have my indefinite block removed when I can't even reach them. Apparently, they blocked me from contacting them to appeal my indefinite block. I have been listed as the same kind of unsavory characters in this administrator's indefinite block list as if I am some kind of criminal or something. Kind of harsh, don't you think? How do I get resolution on this Newlivingmagazine (talk) 01:08, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the above notice, which explains why your account has been blocked, and what action you can take to resolve this.  Chzz  ►  01:36, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As a reviewing administrator, may I ask how you intend to contribute to Wikipedia in a manner that isn't contrary to our Wikipedia:Conflict of interest policy? From what you've written here so far, it seems unlikely that you have any intention of contributing to the encyclopedia instead of just writing about your own publication. By the way, the email address you posted above is invalid because you forgot the @ symbol. --  Netsnipe  ►  01:49, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

First, I wanted to list New Living Magazine as a reference source for people interested in health and fitness resources as I see "Muscle and Fitness" and some other health and fitness related publications do. Obviously, I did not read all the formatting rules and regulations and sincerely apologize for that. After posting the reference to New Living Magazine, I intended on contributing copyright free content since I have been a health and fitness editor/writer for almost 20 years; I have a wealth of knowledge on a wide range of timely health and fitness related topics that would be extremely valuable to other Wikipedia users once I got the hang of creating articles. Seriously, I meant no blatant self-promotion. I would appreciate it if you could see past my error and see that I actually have lots of good material to contribute to the Wikipedia community. Anyway, New Living Magazine both print and web versions are free, just like Wikipedia. That should speak for itself. We're on the same page here. Can you please consider "indefinitely" unblocking my account so that I can start over starting with a new username, etc.? I meant no harm and it won't happen again. Thanks. Newlivingmagazine (talk) 02:08, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

PS, I read your "conflict of interest" page and totally understand where you're coming from and how submitting certain kinds of material to Wikipedia can cause problems, so I know what and what not to do. For example, I wanted to contribute an article on "Colloidal Silver" and its "Health Benefits" in relation to helping to fight the "Swine Flu" and had reseaarch articles to cite on the subject. I was not going to promote any products, just strictly provide information. Hope that clarifies my intentions.Newlivingmagazine (talk) 02:19, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You should create a new, personal account and forget about this one. I recommend that you disclose the fact that you are affiliated with New Living on your new User page, and/or just avoid doing edits that could be seen as promotional for New Living (the way I'd go). It is definitely allowed for you to create a new account, especially if your old username could have been seen as promotional. Add the {{helpme}} template back to this page if you need help in doing this. Regarding collodial silver, I'd suggest that you ensure that you review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Verifiability as that is a very controversial topic and the quality of the sources will have to be very high. Thanks. Gigs (talk) 02:23, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

{{helpme}} I can not create a new user account until my IP address is unblocked. Seems User:Juliancolton who indefinitely blocked me is very unforgiving. Can you please help me? That's what my cry for help is all about. Thanks for the feedback on colloidal silver you are right on that, but I do have some reliable unbiased scientific studies I can reference.