Talk:Recorded Music NZ: Difference between revisions
→Chart Trivia: new section |
|||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
considering PPNZ is a division of RIANZ, I don't think it needs its own page. Let me know what you think.-- [[User:Danreilly123|<font color="0000FF">'''Danreilly123'''</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Danreilly123|<font color="000000">'''(talk)'''</font>]]</sup> 08:43, 14 May 2009 (UTC) |
considering PPNZ is a division of RIANZ, I don't think it needs its own page. Let me know what you think.-- [[User:Danreilly123|<font color="0000FF">'''Danreilly123'''</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Danreilly123|<font color="000000">'''(talk)'''</font>]]</sup> 08:43, 14 May 2009 (UTC) |
||
:'''Support''', as above.-- [[User:Danreilly123|<font color="0000FF">'''Danreilly123'''</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Danreilly123|<font color="000000">'''(talk)'''</font>]]</sup> 08:43, 14 May 2009 (UTC) |
:'''Support''', as above.-- [[User:Danreilly123|<font color="0000FF">'''Danreilly123'''</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Danreilly123|<font color="000000">'''(talk)'''</font>]]</sup> 08:43, 14 May 2009 (UTC) |
||
The two entities have seperate roles (RIANZ is a representative body, PPNZ is a performance rights society). In a larger historical context, there has been widespread confusion of the roles of each caused by incorporating them under one unbrella. |
|||
[[User:Ppnz|Ppnz]] ([[User talk:Ppnz|talk]]) 00:26, 18 June 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Chart Trivia == |
== Chart Trivia == |
||
Revision as of 00:26, 18 June 2009
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Recorded Music NZ article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Fair use rationale for Image:Rianz-logo.jpg
Image:Rianz-logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:15, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
PPNZ merge into RIANZ
considering PPNZ is a division of RIANZ, I don't think it needs its own page. Let me know what you think.-- Danreilly123(talk) 08:43, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support, as above.-- Danreilly123(talk) 08:43, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
The two entities have seperate roles (RIANZ is a representative body, PPNZ is a performance rights society). In a larger historical context, there has been widespread confusion of the roles of each caused by incorporating them under one unbrella. Ppnz (talk) 00:26, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
Chart Trivia
I am in the middle of putting together a whole lot of chart trivia (based on the Australian charts) about the RIANZ charts. Will be putting all of it in a new article. Any help is appreciated, this is what i have so far. -- Danreilly123(talk) 03:52, 29 May 2009 (UTC)