User talk:Deepfriedokra/20120823-20130831: Difference between revisions
→Rfa: more |
|||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
Well, now i need the huggle application to cheat and amass an absurd amount of edits in a short span of time. [[User:Texcarson|Texcarson]] ([[User talk:Texcarson|talk]]) 18:40, 1 July 2009 (UTC) |
Well, now i need the huggle application to cheat and amass an absurd amount of edits in a short span of time. [[User:Texcarson|Texcarson]] ([[User talk:Texcarson|talk]]) 18:40, 1 July 2009 (UTC) |
||
:Actually, I made 1,000 reversions a month for many months by hand. (There has been a bias against Huggle recently. I don't know which way that trend will go. I don't recommend Huggle for that reason.) If like me, you have a physical condition that makes typing difficult, you can always copy some of the vandal warnings from[[Wikipedia:Template_messages/User_talk_namespace#Multi-level_templates]] to text file and then use it to copy/paste warnings to vandal pages, tailoring them as needed. I use twinkle myself. It does not go so fast that I can't prevent mistakes and has a nice selection. I recommend avoiding animation until you have a clear understanding of the relevant policies and a reputation for having that understanding. My first animated tool was VandalProof. I had to apply for that and had already made thousands of reversions when I got it. Be sure to not neglect article building-- that is valued by the community. There are still many article that need improvement. Cheers, [[User:Dlohcierekim|<font color="#00ff00"> Dloh</font>]][[User_talk:Dlohcierekim|<font color="#bb00bb">cierekim''' </font>]] 18:51, 1 July 2009 (UTC) |
:Actually, I made 1,000 reversions a month for many months by hand. (There has been a bias against Huggle recently. I don't know which way that trend will go. I don't recommend Huggle for that reason.) If like me, you have a physical condition that makes typing difficult, you can always copy some of the vandal warnings from[[Wikipedia:Template_messages/User_talk_namespace#Multi-level_templates]] to text file and then use it to copy/paste warnings to vandal pages, tailoring them as needed. I use twinkle myself. It does not go so fast that I can't prevent mistakes and has a nice selection. I recommend avoiding animation until you have a clear understanding of the relevant policies and a reputation for having that understanding. My first animated tool was VandalProof. I had to apply for that and had already made thousands of reversions when I got it. Be sure to not neglect article building-- that is valued by the community. There are still many article that need improvement. Cheers, [[User:Dlohcierekim|<font color="#00ff00"> Dloh</font>]][[User_talk:Dlohcierekim|<font color="#bb00bb">cierekim''' </font>]] 18:51, 1 July 2009 (UTC) |
||
::Would you trust Jimbo using the WMF credit card? [[User:Texcarson|Texcarson]] ([[User talk:Texcarson|talk]]) 19:07, 1 July 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 19:07, 1 July 2009
 | This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
Archives
Vandalism is futile
Please understand that this userpage is frequently vandalized, and vandalism is reverted pretty quickly. You will not accomplish anything by vandalizing Wikipedia. If you wish to try test editing, you may do so in our sandbox located at Wikipedia:Sandbox or create a test subpage by putting "/test" after your username and clicking "create page." Thanks
Contacting me and the Messages
If you wish to contact me, the quickest and easiest way is to CLICK HERE.
If you have a question about a deleted article, please leave a message by CLICKING HERE.
You can also appeal a deletion by clicking this link to Deletion Review and following the directions found there.
Attacks in <<REDACHTED PER blp>>
I was the one who posted the REDACHTED Page. I thinkn I was as factual as possible. I made no opinions on the page and stuck to the facts. I would hope Wiki would understand the seriousness as much as I do for this type of post. I understand what could happen if someone has the wrong information and how important being factual it is. Are there certain parts that are acceptable and certain parts that are not? Help me learn so we can get a factual and quality post on this subject.
Do you think that with positive information as well as what was posted that this would be an acceptable topic. Do you disagree that the subject matter does create notoriaty (sorry for spelling) —Preceding unsigned comment added by REDACHTED REDACHTED contribs) 01:38, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
- No. He does not meet notability requirements. He would be notable for one event only, if he were notable. This fails Wikipedia:BLP#Articles_about_people_notable_only_for_one_event. Dlohcierekim 01:45, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
Now that is the first valid answer I have recieved. Understood. —Preceding unsigned comment added by REDACHTED] • contribs) 02:08, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
Rfa
Well, now i need the huggle application to cheat and amass an absurd amount of edits in a short span of time. Texcarson (talk) 18:40, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
- Actually, I made 1,000 reversions a month for many months by hand. (There has been a bias against Huggle recently. I don't know which way that trend will go. I don't recommend Huggle for that reason.) If like me, you have a physical condition that makes typing difficult, you can always copy some of the vandal warnings fromWikipedia:Template_messages/User_talk_namespace#Multi-level_templates to text file and then use it to copy/paste warnings to vandal pages, tailoring them as needed. I use twinkle myself. It does not go so fast that I can't prevent mistakes and has a nice selection. I recommend avoiding animation until you have a clear understanding of the relevant policies and a reputation for having that understanding. My first animated tool was VandalProof. I had to apply for that and had already made thousands of reversions when I got it. Be sure to not neglect article building-- that is valued by the community. There are still many article that need improvement. Cheers, Dlohcierekim 18:51, 1 July 2009 (UTC)