Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gfire: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 13:45, 17 July 2009

Gfire

Does not assert notability, nor is notability evident. Google hits can be considered representative of even a non-notable OSS project. Not to get too much into WP:OTHERSTUFF, but it is a plugin for the (certainly notable) Pidgin, about no other plugins of which have articles heretofore been written. — flamingspinach | (talk) 22:05, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 23:08, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I can find lots of forum posts and download sites but no coverage about it in reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 12:54, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this sounds like something you could just make up b stirring some object in a bowl! not for here Hasmme Vogel (talk) 13:45, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 12:54, 17 July 2009 edit Whpq (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Administrators 145,833 edits del ← Previous edit		Revision as of 13:45, 17 July 2009 edit undo Hasmme Vogel (talk \| contribs) 13 edits →Gfire Next edit →
Line 7:		Line 7:

	*'''Delete''' - I can find lots of forum posts and download sites but no coverage about it in reliable sources. -- [[User:Whpq\|Whpq]] ([[User talk:Whpq\|talk]]) 12:54, 17 July 2009 (UTC)		*'''Delete''' - I can find lots of forum posts and download sites but no coverage about it in reliable sources. -- [[User:Whpq\|Whpq]] ([[User talk:Whpq\|talk]]) 12:54, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
			*'''Delete''' this sounds like something you could just make up b stirring some object in a bowl! not for here [[User:Hasmme Vogel\|Hasmme Vogel]] ([[User talk:Hasmme Vogel\|talk]]) 13:45, 17 July 2009 (UTC)