Jump to content

User talk:Jfdwolff: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 48: Line 48:


:I think I suggested that a message be left on [[WT:JEW]] concerning this dispute. [[User:Jfdwolff|JFW]]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[[User_talk:Jfdwolff|<small>T@lk</small>]] 16:20, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
:I think I suggested that a message be left on [[WT:JEW]] concerning this dispute. [[User:Jfdwolff|JFW]]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[[User_talk:Jfdwolff|<small>T@lk</small>]] 16:20, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Again... that does not change the facts stated above. Sad... but in these 3 weeks, it better stay without more comments from my side. [[Special:Contributions/84.109.111.130|84.109.111.130]] ([[User talk:84.109.111.130|talk]]) 18:20, 21 July 2009 (UTC)


==Hypopituitarism==
==Hypopituitarism==

Revision as of 18:20, 21 July 2009

Template:Archive box collapsible

RFC on extrasolar planet lists restructuring

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:List_of_extrasolar_planets#Restructuring_discussion

If you belive this is worth your time, perhaps you could turn the attention of a few other people, besides the few people there already there, that you think would not mind having a look/say. GabrielVelasquez (talk) 22:40, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Linezolid

I've explained some of the more jargon-heavy stuff, such as Gram-positive, post-antibiotic effect, high bioavailability etc. If you have any further suggestions, they'd be greatly appreciated, after working on this article for eleven months, it's safe to say my strategic distance is completely shot :) Fvasconcellos (t·c) 02:19, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rosuvastatin.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Rosuvastatin.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —harej (talk) (cool!) 09:15, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

care to assist?

I hope to go live with User:MichaelQSchmidt/sandbox/National Fibromyalgia Association within the next day or so. If anyone can expand a section, add a source, or corect a typo... please help out. Thanks, MichaelQSchmidt (talk) 22:52, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for asking my opinion. I think the article is of good quality and well sourced to reliable sources. I have no comments currently. JFW | T@lk 12:20, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cluster Headaches

Hello, I'm not sure why you felt the links to articles and information, provided by the City of London Migraine Clinic, that I added to the Cluster Headaches were inappropriate. It is a registered charity providing an invaluable service. The Clinic and I have nothing to gain from passing this information on so it can be of used by those that would benefit from it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ssim24 (talkcontribs) 13:01, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ADHD

We just finished arbitration. Strong sactions are in place. Therefore edit warring should not occur. Cheers. --Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 13:09, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, I answered your questions on Doc James' talk page. - Hordaland (talk) 19:49, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
And it's now become a whole thread there. :) - Hordaland (talk) 21:08, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rashash always

Could you please pay some attention to the lack of participation of the vexing editor in the discussion page on Rashash ...? The vexing editor was very prompt to denounce legitimate changes in the disambiguation page... but when it becomes constructive, where are the proponents of the official consensus? You did not even comment on the proposition... just argued that we "do not seem to agree". There is no problem of agreement, simply a disdain of what is proposed and a lack of discussion. What can be wrong in the propostion of making the Sar Shalom Sharabi page the main topic and the other Lithuanian Rabbi referenced in a hatnote. So many disambiguation pages use this third scenario. What would be wrong to do so here? (except having to disagreee with a false consensus) 84.109.111.130 (talk) 16:06, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think I suggested that a message be left on WT:JEW concerning this dispute. JFW | T@lk 16:20, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Again... that does not change the facts stated above. Sad... but in these 3 weeks, it better stay without more comments from my side. 84.109.111.130 (talk) 18:20, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hypopituitarism

7/20/09 I would like to know if you have experience with hypopituitarism? I have a three year old son who was born cortisol dependent also low thyroid and he is on a growth hormone. My main concern is he has had severe eczema for the past 1 1/2 and he is now seeing a specialist in dermatology but will not link the problems together. There has not been any medication creams that he has tried which had been over 20 different creams and medications to Help his eczema, but it has not changed or helped his skin at all. Do you think there is a possibility it could be because he is cortisol dependent?--Indigo3 (talk) 22:07, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You asked your question on Talk:Hypopituitarism#Moved, where it was answered by myself and Alteripse (talk · contribs). I think you should put this question to your paediatric endocrinologist. Alteripse also gave you the link to the Magic Foundation (http://www.magicfoundation.org/www) which might be helpful. I really can't say anything about the link, and in fact I even undertook a Pubmed search to clarify this for you. JFW | T@lk 22:40, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]