Talk:Integration clause: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 10:18, 11 August 2009

Law Start‑class Mid‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

I think modern jurisprudence says that an integration clause raises a rebuttable presumption of complete integration. I'll edit upon confirmation.

Is this the same as a 'four corners clause'?--194.78.17.162 (talk) 10:18, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 20:29, 5 July 2009 edit Aboutmovies (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 411,704 edits m update WikiProject WikiProject Law (Start/Mid) ← Previous edit		Revision as of 10:18, 11 August 2009 edit undo 194.78.17.162 (talk) No edit summary Next edit →
Line 3:		Line 3:

	I think modern jurisprudence says that an integration clause raises a rebuttable presumption of complete integration. I'll edit upon confirmation.		I think modern jurisprudence says that an integration clause raises a rebuttable presumption of complete integration. I'll edit upon confirmation.

			Is this the same as a 'four corners clause'?--[[Special:Contributions/194.78.17.162\|194.78.17.162]] ([[User talk:194.78.17.162\|talk]]) 10:18, 11 August 2009 (UTC)