Talk:Routledge: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 00:33, 21 August 2009

Companies Stub‑class

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Stub This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Can I add on list Rouladge Encyclopedia of Medieval civilization?--Vojvodaen (talk) 11:54, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The relationship between the company and Taylor & Francis needs to be addressed with

a reliable reference. A link from Taylor & Francis is not sufficient to demonstrate the relationship--222.64.26.148 (talk) 00:02, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The following page claims that the company is the member of Taylor & Francis, not sub-division, which means that the membership may be expired sometimes in the future

http://www.routledge.com/info/ --222.64.26.148 (talk) 00:11, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This info needs to be verified....

http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content~content=a713687881~db=all~order=page

http://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/24231/ --222.64.26.148 (talk) 00:26, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It typically demonstrate the urgent requirement of publishing standard

Revision as of 00:32, 21 August 2009 edit 222.64.26.148 (talk) →This info needs to be verified.... ← Previous edit		Revision as of 00:33, 21 August 2009 edit undo 222.64.26.148 (talk) →This info needs to be verified.... Next edit →
Line 18:		Line 18:
	--[[Special:Contributions/222.64.26.148\|222.64.26.148]] ([[User talk:222.64.26.148\|talk]]) 00:26, 21 August 2009 (UTC)		--[[Special:Contributions/222.64.26.148\|222.64.26.148]] ([[User talk:222.64.26.148\|talk]]) 00:26, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

	It typically demonstrate the requirement of [[publishing standard]]		It typically demonstrate the urgent requirement of [[publishing standard]]