Verdanagate: Difference between revisions
{{subst:prod|non-notable, non-event and the title is utterly ridiculous}} |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
== Disapproval of the change == |
== Disapproval of the change == |
||
A large number of bloggers and graphic designers expressed grave disapproval of the change almost immediately after its unveiling. Dissent was made public via online blogs and microblogging.<ref>[http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5geYlBYTlLIO5k6bVAzQxh7CHbcxQD9ADD4480] - Style critics hit latest Ikea design: catalog type</ref> It generally revolved around the widely held perception of IKEA's product line as promoting innovative product and graphic design over the entirety of its existence. The catalog was one of the most printed documents in the world, being printed annually more than copies of the [[Bible]]. |
A large number of bloggers and graphic designers expressed grave disapproval of the change almost immediately after its unveiling. Dissent was made public via online blogs and microblogging.<ref>[http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5geYlBYTlLIO5k6bVAzQxh7CHbcxQD9ADD4480] - Style critics hit latest Ikea design: catalog type</ref> It generally revolved around the widely held perception of IKEA's product line as promoting innovative product and graphic design over the entirety of its existence. The catalog was one of the most printed documents in the world, being printed annually more than copies of the [[Bible]].{{citation needed}} |
||
<!-- put something here about the company's initial response --> |
<!-- put something here about the company's initial response --> |
||
<!-- Petitions and blogger response highlights --> |
<!-- Petitions and blogger response highlights --> |
||
== See also == |
== See also == |
||
* [[Typography]] |
* [[Typography]] |
||
Revision as of 10:34, 31 August 2009
This article may have been previously nominated for deletion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Verdanagate exists. It is proposed that this article be deleted because of the following concern:
If you can address this concern by improving, copyediting, sourcing, renaming, or merging the page, please edit this page and do so. You may remove this message if you improve the article or otherwise object to deletion for any reason. Although not required, you are encouraged to explain why you object to the deletion, either in your edit summary or on the talk page. If this template is removed, do not replace it. This message has remained in place for seven days, so the article may be deleted without further notice. Find sources: "Verdanagate" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR Nominator: Please consider notifying the author/project: {{subst:proposed deletion notify|Verdanagate|concern=non-notable, non-event and the title is utterly ridiculous.''' One sentence in the [[IKEA]] article is all we need.}} ~~~~Timestamp: 20090831094838 09:48, 31 August 2009 (UTC) Administrators: delete |
 | The topic of this article may not meet Wikipedia's general notability guideline. |
 | This article needs additional citations for verification. |
Verdanagate refers to the controversy and dissent that came forth after IKEA changed the main typeface used in its catalog to Verdana starting with the 2010 printing. After using a variation of the Futura typeface in its advertising and catalogs called Ikea Sans for many years, the company switched to Verdana. They cited reasons such as wanting to have the ability to use a single typeface in both print and web media on a global scale.
Disapproval of the change
A large number of bloggers and graphic designers expressed grave disapproval of the change almost immediately after its unveiling. Dissent was made public via online blogs and microblogging.[1] It generally revolved around the widely held perception of IKEA's product line as promoting innovative product and graphic design over the entirety of its existence. The catalog was one of the most printed documents in the world, being printed annually more than copies of the Bible.[citation needed]