Talk:Christof Koch: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
*External links present which could be used to expand article |
*External links present which could be used to expand article |
||
[[User:Espresso Addict|Espresso Addict]] 15:15, 20 July 2007 (UTC) |
[[User:Espresso Addict|Espresso Addict]] 15:15, 20 July 2007 (UTC) |
||
== Erdős Number == |
|||
I use Wikipedia a great deal in my own research to scratch the surface of many related topics. I appreciate the humor in the "tongue-in-cheek measurement of mathematical prominence", but it has little use in understanding anybody's work or significance within the larger community. It's just one more reference to filter out as I navigate this on-line encyclopedia for my own efforts. |
|||
I certainly don't want to stifle folks' fun, but I hope such references do not become commonplace in Wikipedia. Such distractions in larger numbers will only weaken this fantastic tool. [[User:Wolfworks|Wolfworks]] ([[User talk:Wolfworks|talk]]) 16:22, 2 September 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:22, 2 September 2009
Biography: Science and Academia Stub‑class | ||||||||||
|
Review comments
Some suggestions for improvement as the article is expanded:
- Template:Infobox Scientist should be added
- Photograph should be added from a source with a free license
- Some biographical information required, including some education details (eg first degree), other positions held etc
- Article needs expanding and should emphasise reasons for notability of subject
- Article should be divided into appropriate subheadings
- Information on research should be expanded and references required
- References should be expanded and preferably converted to inline format
- External links present which could be used to expand article
Espresso Addict 15:15, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
Erdős Number
I use Wikipedia a great deal in my own research to scratch the surface of many related topics. I appreciate the humor in the "tongue-in-cheek measurement of mathematical prominence", but it has little use in understanding anybody's work or significance within the larger community. It's just one more reference to filter out as I navigate this on-line encyclopedia for my own efforts.
I certainly don't want to stifle folks' fun, but I hope such references do not become commonplace in Wikipedia. Such distractions in larger numbers will only weaken this fantastic tool. Wolfworks (talk) 16:22, 2 September 2009 (UTC)