Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joachim Cronman: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Drawn Some (talk | contribs)
Creating deletion discussion page for Joachim Cronman. (TW)
 
Drawn Some (talk | contribs)
Line 4: Line 4:
:{{la|Joachim Cronman}} – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joachim Cronman|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2009 September 11#{{anchorencode:Joachim Cronman}}|View log]])</noinclude>
:{{la|Joachim Cronman}} – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joachim Cronman|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2009 September 11#{{anchorencode:Joachim Cronman}}|View log]])</noinclude>
:({{findsources|Joachim Cronman}})
:({{findsources|Joachim Cronman}})
This genealogical entry on a non-notable person violates a Wikipedia policy, [[WP:NOT]]: "Genealogical entries. Biography articles should only be for people with some sort of fame, achievement, or perhaps notoriety. " This is community consensus expressed in policy and quoted here by me, not my personal opinion.
This genealogical entry on a non-notable person violates a Wikipedia policy, [[WP:NOT]]: "Genealogical entries. Biography articles should only be for people with some sort of fame, achievement, or perhaps notoriety. " This is community consensus expressed in policy and quoted here by me, not my personal opinion. [[User:Drawn Some|Drawn Some]] ([[User talk:Drawn Some|talk]]) 20:09, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
[[User:Drawn Some|Drawn Some]] ([[User talk:Drawn Some|talk]]) 20:09, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:10, 11 September 2009

Joachim Cronman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This genealogical entry on a non-notable person violates a Wikipedia policy, WP:NOT: "Genealogical entries. Biography articles should only be for people with some sort of fame, achievement, or perhaps notoriety. " This is community consensus expressed in policy and quoted here by me, not my personal opinion. Drawn Some (talk) 20:09, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]