Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joachim Cronman: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Drawn Some (talk | contribs) Creating deletion discussion page for Joachim Cronman. (TW) |
Drawn Some (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:{{la|Joachim Cronman}} – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joachim Cronman|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2009 September 11#{{anchorencode:Joachim Cronman}}|View log]])</noinclude> |
:{{la|Joachim Cronman}} – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joachim Cronman|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2009 September 11#{{anchorencode:Joachim Cronman}}|View log]])</noinclude> |
||
:({{findsources|Joachim Cronman}}) |
:({{findsources|Joachim Cronman}}) |
||
This genealogical entry on a non-notable person violates a Wikipedia policy, [[WP:NOT]]: "Genealogical entries. Biography articles should only be for people with some sort of fame, achievement, or perhaps notoriety. " This is community consensus expressed in policy and quoted here by me, not my personal opinion. |
This genealogical entry on a non-notable person violates a Wikipedia policy, [[WP:NOT]]: "Genealogical entries. Biography articles should only be for people with some sort of fame, achievement, or perhaps notoriety. " This is community consensus expressed in policy and quoted here by me, not my personal opinion. [[User:Drawn Some|Drawn Some]] ([[User talk:Drawn Some|talk]]) 20:09, 11 September 2009 (UTC) |
||
[[User:Drawn Some|Drawn Some]] ([[User talk:Drawn Some|talk]]) 20:09, 11 September 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:10, 11 September 2009
- Joachim Cronman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This genealogical entry on a non-notable person violates a Wikipedia policy, WP:NOT: "Genealogical entries. Biography articles should only be for people with some sort of fame, achievement, or perhaps notoriety. " This is community consensus expressed in policy and quoted here by me, not my personal opinion. Drawn Some (talk) 20:09, 11 September 2009 (UTC)