User talk:81.109.10.218: Difference between revisions
Final warning: Not adhering to neutral point of view. (TW) |
|||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
It's still wrong. The 9/11 Commission simply noted that the design places an unusual amount of the load-bearing capacity of the building on the perimeter for a building of this size, with a clear span to the core columns. Normally, there'd be another row of columns between the core and the outside. They put it a bit plainly there, but you're not saying what the commission report says. Please reconsider. '''<font face="Arial">[[User:Acroterion|<font color="black">Acroterion</font>]] <sub><small>[[User talk:Acroterion|<font color="gray">(talk)</font>]]</small></sub></font>''' 01:10, 18 September 2009 (UTC) |
It's still wrong. The 9/11 Commission simply noted that the design places an unusual amount of the load-bearing capacity of the building on the perimeter for a building of this size, with a clear span to the core columns. Normally, there'd be another row of columns between the core and the outside. They put it a bit plainly there, but you're not saying what the commission report says. Please reconsider. '''<font face="Arial">[[User:Acroterion|<font color="black">Acroterion</font>]] <sub><small>[[User talk:Acroterion|<font color="gray">(talk)</font>]]</small></sub></font>''' 01:10, 18 September 2009 (UTC) |
||
[[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px]] Please do not continue to violate Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view]] policy, as you did with <span class="plainlinks">[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Trade_Center_controlled_demolition_conspiracy_theories?diff=314634545 this edit]</span> to [[:World Trade Center controlled demolition conspiracy theories]]. If you continue to do so, you will be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing. <!-- Template:uw-hugglenpov3 --> — [[User:Jeff G.|Jeff G.]] ([[User:Jeff G./talk|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Jeff G.|contribs]]) 01:11, 18 September 2009 (UTC) |
|||
[[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px]] This is the '''last warning''' you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you violate Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view policy]] by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article{{#if:|, as you did to [[:{{{1}}}]]}}, you '''will''' be blocked from editing Wikipedia. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-npov4 --> ''Try and remember that things may make perfect sense. (towers falling and demo) it doesn't matter what makes sense only what we can reliably prove with sources. You may want to drop the subject for a while.'' [[User:Hell in a Bucket|Hell In A Bucket]] ([[User talk:Hell in a Bucket|talk]]) 02:50, 20 September 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:''If this is a shared [[IP address]], and you didn't make the edit, consider [[Wikipedia:Why create an account?|creating an account]] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.'' |
|||
Revision as of 22:13, 22 September 2009
June 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Arhat. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. .`^) Paine Ellsworthdiss`cuss (^`. 08:01, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Warnings
Please also see WP:V "Verifiability not truth". Mitsube (talk) 23:27, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
New message
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
- Please consider creating an account for yourself!
September 2009
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 00:44, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
It's still wrong. The 9/11 Commission simply noted that the design places an unusual amount of the load-bearing capacity of the building on the perimeter for a building of this size, with a clear span to the core columns. Normally, there'd be another row of columns between the core and the outside. They put it a bit plainly there, but you're not saying what the commission report says. Please reconsider. Acroterion (talk) 01:10, 18 September 2009 (UTC)