Jump to content

Talk:Skip-Bo: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
+{{BTGProject}}
No edit summary
Line 29: Line 29:


[[User:BetacommandBot|BetacommandBot]] 08:54, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
[[User:BetacommandBot|BetacommandBot]] 08:54, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

==Removed Section: Interesting Fact==
The "fact" was a little story about a skip-bo champion who died days after winning while trying to perfect a way to cheat. It read "as a way to cheat on his wife" when I first read it, which caught my eye as being nonsensical. I initially edited it to reflect the text on the page it cited which merely said he was perfecting a way to cheat. But then when I looked closer at the cite page I realized it was a blog page with only one entry, the one on the supposed champion. I couldn't find any other information on the man in a google search, and have removed the entire section.

Revision as of 06:34, 29 September 2009

WikiProject iconBoard and table games Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is part of WikiProject Board and table games, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to board games and tabletop games. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I believe the following is an inaccurate statement:

"Rules that have changed

An earlier version of the game (current as of 1980) had 24 SKIP-BO cards for a total of 168 cards, and did not prohibit playing a SKIP-BO card on top of another SKIP-BO card.


Mattel's newest version does not prohibit playing a SKIP-BO on top of another SKIP-BO.

==

removed the following text, as I feel it is bogus: ", but you can’t play 2 in a row and you always have to cover it up with a number card, so you can’t use it as a 12 card" I do not believe the rules specify that.

==

To future editors: I added the images of Skip-bo Cards thinking it might make the page clearer. I have been away from Wikipedia for some time, and would be pleased for others to make changes considered better. Alison Phil talk 13:55, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

==

From what I can see in the PDF file, there's nothing disallowing consecutive Skip-Bo cards on the same Building Pile. Additionally, in the Nintendo DS reincarnation of the game, allowing or disallowing consecutive Skip-Bos is a player-controlled option, the default being to allow. MewtwoStruckBack 01:22, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

==

Fair use rationale for Image:Skip-Bo.JPG

Image:Skip-Bo.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 08:54, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Removed Section: Interesting Fact

The "fact" was a little story about a skip-bo champion who died days after winning while trying to perfect a way to cheat. It read "as a way to cheat on his wife" when I first read it, which caught my eye as being nonsensical. I initially edited it to reflect the text on the page it cited which merely said he was perfecting a way to cheat. But then when I looked closer at the cite page I realized it was a blog page with only one entry, the one on the supposed champion. I couldn't find any other information on the man in a google search, and have removed the entire section.