Talk:All Nightmare Long: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 15:20, 4 October 2009

Metal Start‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of heavy metal music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MetalWikipedia:WikiProject MetalTemplate:WikiProject MetalHeavy Metal articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Songs Start‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

will all night mare long be released usa tooo

Factious Soviet newsreels?

Are you serious? Of course this is not an actual newsreel. Even the word "ТУНГУССКИЙ" (Tungusian) is misspelled as "ТУНЗКИЙ".77.122.24.53 (talk) 09:05, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah... someone has misunderstood what Kirk said, he said he had some old Soviet film stuff that INSPIRED the video, not that the video was what he had... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.173.53.175 (talk) 02:22, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Respect the rules

Guys, you are violating 3 reverts rule. This rule can be ignored only in case of obvious vandalism. Sure, the text that is being added in non-encyclopedic, but it is not obvious vandalism as well. You should re-word the sencentce to exclude guesswork and unappropriate humor, plus add {{fact}} template. Netrat (talk) 02:57, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I consider adding and reverting unsourced information without proper explanation to be vandalism, they're disruptive edits. Doesn't seem to be an issue right now anyway as the people in question have stopped. Rehevkor ✉ 03:07, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What source do you need, pendos? Learn albanian. There is no source, you can just believe many people speaking russian, or you need someone to write extra article about this? Such a moron. "as the people in question have stopped." - with bans? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.20.143.95 (talk) 23:12, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Everything needs to be verified via a source. Also, takea read of WP:NPA. kk. Rehevkor ✉ 15:29, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I dont give a fuck about your abbreviations. Also, the only way for you to get a source is to learn Russian or to call somebody more competent, pendos. Also, is the comment above for you "source" enough? Hire a translator, then you'll get a source.

If you don't give a "fuck" about Wikipedia policy then you shouldn't be here. Rehevkor ✉ 23:45, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The pendosian "policies" dong dive you rights to just remove anything that you dont like or what you personally find not important or not interesting. Also, can you finally say what kind of verification do you need? I can't really imagine anything but you hire a translator that you can trust. Anything else can be a lie :D
And yes, i decide for myself where i should be and where not, pendosian opinion is not asked. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.20.143.95 (talk) 19:34, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Policies are the corner stones of Wikipedia, it's nothing to do with me personally. Take a read of the reliable sources guidelines for what constitutes a reliable, third party, non-self published source. If it can't be verified it can't be added. It's not simple enough for me to explain here. As I said, if you're not going to bother with the guidelines then don't bother at all, as the burden of proof is on you. I strongly suggest you do read the above guidelines as I'm rather tried of your insults and negative attitude. I'm sure someone else will be happy to help you in the future. HTH HAND. Rehevkor ✉ 15:17, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Should there be thrash?

Since there seems to be an edit war, we'd better discuss it in here. 87.126.67.60 (talk) 09:23, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see an edit war. There is a single IP user who keeps putting it back in and it is always reverted by other users because the term doesn't apply to the song. GripTheHusk (talk) 14:06, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In the first review I added as source, it says that it has "Master of Puppets guitars", meaning that it's guitars are playing as they di on MoP, meaning thrash metal. Bercowich

Thrash

This song is clearly a Thrash song, please understand that and remove the locking. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bercowich (talk • contribs) 15:25, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It has to stay locked for now because there is an IP that keeps adding thrash metal to the genre field in the infobox even though the song is not thrash metal at all and there is a clear consensus that supports that fact. Wether B (talk) 23:56, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 30: / Line 30: @@
 Since there seems to be an edit war, we'd better discuss it in here. [[Special:Contributions/87.126.67.60|87.126.67.60]] ([[User talk:87.126.67.60|talk]]) 09:23, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
 :I don't see an edit war. There is a single IP user who keeps putting it back in and it is always reverted by other users because the term doesn't apply to the song. [[User:GripTheHusk|GripTheHusk]] ([[User talk:GripTheHusk|talk]]) 14:06, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
-:The song is a thrash song, and should then be Thrash, please change this back, whoever think it is Heavy. [[User:Bercowuch|Bercowich]]
+:In the first review I added as source, it says that it has ''"[[Master of Puppets]] guitars"'', meaning that it's guitars are playing as they di on MoP, meaning thrash metal. [[User:Bercowich|Bercowich]]
 == Thrash ==