Talk:All Nightmare Long: Difference between revisions
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
::That is VERY far-fetched. [[User:Elizabeth Bathory|Erzsébet Báthory]]<sub>([[User_talk: Elizabeth Bathory|talk]]|[[Special: Contributions/Elizabeth Bathory|contr.]])</sub> 15:26, 4 October 2009 (UTC) |
::That is VERY far-fetched. [[User:Elizabeth Bathory|Erzsébet Báthory]]<sub>([[User_talk: Elizabeth Bathory|talk]]|[[Special: Contributions/Elizabeth Bathory|contr.]])</sub> 15:26, 4 October 2009 (UTC) |
||
:Ok, my bad, how about this one then: "Nästa höjdpunkt är All nightmare long, plattans musikaliskt bästa och hårdaste låt som är en åtta minuter lång mix av ...And justice, Ride the lightning och Slayer", which means "The next highlight is All nightmare long, the albums musically best and rawest song which is a eight minute long mix of ...And justice (for all), Ride the lightning and Slayer, which is a proffesional review which was in the magazine, so that must mean thrash? [[User:Bercowich|Bercowich]] <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Bercowich|Bercowich]] ([[User talk:Bercowich|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Bercowich|contribs]]) 16:02, 5 October 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
:Ok, my bad, how about this one then: "Nästa höjdpunkt är All nightmare long, plattans musikaliskt bästa och hårdaste låt som är en åtta minuter lång mix av ...And justice, Ride the lightning och Slayer", which means "The next highlight is All nightmare long, the albums musically best and rawest song which is a eight minute long mix of ...And justice (for all), Ride the lightning and Slayer, which is a proffesional review which was in the magazine, so that must mean thrash? [[User:Bercowich|Bercowich]] <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Bercowich|Bercowich]] ([[User talk:Bercowich|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Bercowich|contribs]]) 16:02, 5 October 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
:Why did you change it? It's Swedens biggest magazine and that must count as a proffesional review? [[User:Bercowich|Bercowich]] |
|||
== Thrash == |
== Thrash == |
Revision as of 16:17, 5 October 2009
Metal Start‑class | |||||||
|
Songs Start‑class | |||||||
|
will all night mare long be released usa tooo
Factious Soviet newsreels?
Are you serious? Of course this is not an actual newsreel. Even the word "ТУНГУССКИЙ" (Tungusian) is misspelled as "ТУНЗКИЙ".77.122.24.53 (talk) 09:05, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
Yeah... someone has misunderstood what Kirk said, he said he had some old Soviet film stuff that INSPIRED the video, not that the video was what he had... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.173.53.175 (talk) 02:22, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
Respect the rules
Guys, you are violating 3 reverts rule. This rule can be ignored only in case of obvious vandalism. Sure, the text that is being added in non-encyclopedic, but it is not obvious vandalism as well. You should re-word the sencentce to exclude guesswork and unappropriate humor, plus add {{fact}} template. Netrat (talk) 02:57, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
- I consider adding and reverting unsourced information without proper explanation to be vandalism, they're disruptive edits. Doesn't seem to be an issue right now anyway as the people in question have stopped. Rehevkor ✉ 03:07, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
- What source do you need, pendos? Learn albanian. There is no source, you can just believe many people speaking russian, or you need someone to write extra article about this? Such a moron. "as the people in question have stopped." - with bans? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.20.143.95 (talk) 23:12, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
- Everything needs to be verified via a source. Also, takea read of WP:NPA. kk. Rehevkor ✉ 15:29, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
- I dont give a fuck about your abbreviations. Also, the only way for you to get a source is to learn Russian or to call somebody more competent, pendos. Also, is the comment above for you "source" enough? Hire a translator, then you'll get a source.
- If you don't give a "fuck" about Wikipedia policy then you shouldn't be here. Rehevkor ✉ 23:45, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- The pendosian "policies" dong dive you rights to just remove anything that you dont like or what you personally find not important or not interesting. Also, can you finally say what kind of verification do you need? I can't really imagine anything but you hire a translator that you can trust. Anything else can be a lie :D
And yes, i decide for myself where i should be and where not, pendosian opinion is not asked. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.20.143.95 (talk) 19:34, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- The pendosian "policies" dong dive you rights to just remove anything that you dont like or what you personally find not important or not interesting. Also, can you finally say what kind of verification do you need? I can't really imagine anything but you hire a translator that you can trust. Anything else can be a lie :D
- Policies are the corner stones of Wikipedia, it's nothing to do with me personally. Take a read of the reliable sources guidelines for what constitutes a reliable, third party, non-self published source. If it can't be verified it can't be added. It's not simple enough for me to explain here. As I said, if you're not going to bother with the guidelines then don't bother at all, as the burden of proof is on you. I strongly suggest you do read the above guidelines as I'm rather tried of your insults and negative attitude. I'm sure someone else will be happy to help you in the future. HTH HAND. Rehevkor ✉ 15:17, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Should there be thrash?
Since there seems to be an edit war, we'd better discuss it in here. 87.126.67.60 (talk) 09:23, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
- I don't see an edit war. There is a single IP user who keeps putting it back in and it is always reverted by other users because the term doesn't apply to the song. GripTheHusk (talk) 14:06, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
- In the first review I added as source, it says that it has "Master of Puppets guitars", meaning that it's guitars are playing as they di on MoP, meaning thrash metal. Bercowich
- That is VERY far-fetched. Erzsébet Báthory(talk|contr.) 15:26, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
- Ok, my bad, how about this one then: "Nästa höjdpunkt är All nightmare long, plattans musikaliskt bästa och hårdaste låt som är en åtta minuter lång mix av ...And justice, Ride the lightning och Slayer", which means "The next highlight is All nightmare long, the albums musically best and rawest song which is a eight minute long mix of ...And justice (for all), Ride the lightning and Slayer, which is a proffesional review which was in the magazine, so that must mean thrash? Bercowich —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bercowich (talk • contribs) 16:02, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
- Why did you change it? It's Swedens biggest magazine and that must count as a proffesional review? Bercowich
Thrash
This song is clearly a Thrash song, please understand that and remove the locking. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bercowich (talk • contribs) 15:25, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
- It has to stay locked for now because there is an IP that keeps adding thrash metal to the genre field in the infobox even though the song is not thrash metal at all and there is a clear consensus that supports that fact. Wether B (talk) 23:56, 25 April 2009 (UTC)