User talk:Mehrrunissa: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 04:05, 15 October 2009

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Salwa Judum. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 13:13, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi jeff, today all day along there has been vandalising attempts on the following 3 wiki pages, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naxalite http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communist_Party_of_India_(Maoist) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salwa_Judum

The users "Barakabless", "Agarbatti", "Vinter-light" have following the same patter of deleting large chunks of text and references. This leads me to suspect that they are the same person.

I need help to stop these vandalising attempt. Please tell me how can to stop such these users from such attempt. --Mehrrunissa (talk) 09:14, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Salwa Judum. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 13:18, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war on Salwa Judum & Naxalite

Hi, just want to remind you about WP:3RR. There are better ways then edit war. Skarebo (talk) 13:29, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 14:06, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:DRDO Daksh ROV.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:DRDO Daksh ROV.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:09, 12 October 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —SpaceFlight89 12:09, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kobad Ghandy.jpg

If you first attribute a photo to someone else and then say that you created it yourself, it's obvious you aren't telling the truth. Please stop doing that.Prezbo (talk) 20:18, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 06:43, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for abuse of multiple accounts and IP addresses, specifically to evade the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Someguy1221 (talk) 07:07, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

{{|unblock|This is unfair treatment against me.The sock puppets of vinter-light are Barakabless, Agarbatti. The discussion on their vandalism can be found in link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Salwa_Judum

They were going around deleting large chunk of text and references of other users. I just reverted the edits made by their sockpuppets.

And the claim of 10 million people being cannibalized was made by user Modulispace. His edit can seen in the link. 1=http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title1=Communist_Party_of_India_(Maoist)&diff1=next&oldid=319565386

While reverting the vandalism of barakabless, this claim was unknowingly added to that. It was not my intention to make such a claim.

I request that my userid should be unblocked and i be allowed to continue to make contributions. You can check the talk page of salwa judum were the sock puppets of vinter-light failed to show up for fear of being exposed. I request that vinter-light, barakabless, agarbathi should be investigated for vandalism.}}