Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2009 NSW Premier League results: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
→2009 NSW Premier League results: delete |
SuperSam,, (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
*'''Delete''' - doesn't warrant a separate article [[User:Spiderone|<font color="#996600" size="2px">Spiderone</font>]] 12:50, 18 October 2009 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' - doesn't warrant a separate article [[User:Spiderone|<font color="#996600" size="2px">Spiderone</font>]] 12:50, 18 October 2009 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' - per nom. This information doesnt need a seperate article. [[User:Eddie6705|Eddie6705]] ([[User talk:Eddie6705|talk]]) 15:29, 18 October 2009 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' - per nom. This information doesnt need a seperate article. [[User:Eddie6705|Eddie6705]] ([[User talk:Eddie6705|talk]]) 15:29, 18 October 2009 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' - 2 numbers showing a result does not cover as being sufficient, when detailed results are. [[User:SuperSam,,|SuperSam,,]] ([[User talk:SuperSam,,|talk]]) 04:34, 20 October 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:34, 20 October 2009
- 2009 NSW Premier League results (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Excessive detail for the results of a domestic football season, thus a violation of WP:NOT#IINFO. Content is sufficiently avaiable at 2009 NSW Premier League season. Soccer-holicI hear voices in my head... 11:08, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. Soccer-holicI hear voices in my head... 11:13, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
- Delete - content is already covered in an existing article, no reason for a seperate one. GiantSnowman 11:56, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
- Delete - doesn't warrant a separate article Spiderone 12:50, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
- Delete - per nom. This information doesnt need a seperate article. Eddie6705 (talk) 15:29, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - 2 numbers showing a result does not cover as being sufficient, when detailed results are. SuperSam,, (talk) 04:34, 20 October 2009 (UTC)