Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GoDigital Media Group: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 08:53, 6 November 2009

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete Gazimoff 08:53, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GoDigital Media Group

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Don't have any care if this is deleted or not, but it's been proposed for speedy three times and prodded once, so I thought AfD would be a better venue. Cheers, —Ed (talk • contribs) 02:37, 30 October 2009 (UTC) [reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. — Jujutacular ^T · C 04:24, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — Jujutacular ^T · C 04:24, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and improve. This has potential to be notable. -- ISLANDERS27 09:33, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I removed a speedy tag because I think the article at least asserts notability. Many of the references are press releases and such. These are what I found that might show notability: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]. Enough? I don't know really.--Apoc2400 (talk) 11:15, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete those links merely prove that the subject exists, not that it is particularly notable -Drdisque (talk) 15:01, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. GoDigital Marketing Services focuses on Online PR and viral and interactive campaigns, and something highly unusual needs to happen before any business of this sort becomes an encyclopedia subject. The collection of press releases and self-published sources seem rather lawyerly, and do not at all establish the notability of the business. Of the two sources found by Google News, one is an offhand mention in an article about an entertainer they represent, and the other a puff piece about twenty-something proprietors. Neither of these really establish that this business has done anything historically important. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 19:42, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - non-notable company, no significant coverage, should have been speedied. --Orange Mike | Talk 21:52, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this page.''
+<!--Template:Afd top
+Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
+The result was    '''Delete''' '''''<font color="green">[[User:Gazimoff|Gazi]]</font><font color="blue">[[User talk:Gazimoff|moff]]</font>''''' 08:53, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
 ===[[GoDigital Media Group]]===
-{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|O}}
 :{{la|GoDigital Media Group}} – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GoDigital Media Group|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2009 October 30#{{anchorencode:GoDigital Media Group}}|View log]])</noinclude>
@@ Line 12: / Line 19: @@
 *'''Delete'''.  ''GoDigital Marketing Services focuses on Online PR and viral and interactive campaigns'', and something highly unusual needs to happen before any business of this sort becomes an encyclopedia subject.  The collection of press releases and self-published sources seem rather [[WP:LAWYER|lawyerly]], and do not at all establish the notability of the business.  Of the two sources found by [http://news.google.com/archivesearch?&as_src=-newswire+-wire+-presswire+-PR+-press+-release+-wikipedia&q=%22GoDigital+Media+Group%22 Google News], one is an offhand mention in an article about an entertainer they represent, and the other a puff piece about twenty-something proprietors.  Neither of these really establish that this business has done anything historically important. - [[User:Ihcoyc|Smerdis of Tlön]] ([[User talk:Ihcoyc|talk]]) 19:42, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
 *'''Delete''' - non-notable company, no significant coverage, should have been speedied. --[[User:Orangemike|<font color="darkorange">Orange Mike</font>]]  &#x007C;  [[User talk:Orangemike|<font color="orange">Talk</font>]] 21:52, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>