Talk:Ochota massacre: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 00:44, 12 November 2009

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ochota massacre article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Poland C‑class

	Poland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Military history: European / Polish / World War II Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	European military history task force
	Polish military history task force
	World War II task force

Human rights C‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Nomenclature of Polish addresses

What's with this 'Grójecka Street' business? Would you ever see Bahnhofstrasse translated into English as Bahnhoff Street or Rue St. Michel as St. Michel Road? Say it loud - ulica (ul.) and be proud! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.31.215.66 (talk) 20:01, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

academic sourcing

this article is lacking credible sources. it is clearly a very important topic and by making bold claims-- such as gang rape in a cancer ward-- without real evidence we are only weakening the over all article and the injustice it seeks to disclose.

a personal website about wwii is not a credible source. george duncan is a nobody, and while he may have done valuable research that reseacrh needs to be cited, not him.

@@ Line 25: / Line 25: @@
 What's with this 'Grójecka Street' business? Would you ever see Bahnhofstrasse translated into English as Bahnhoff Street or Rue St. Michel as St. Michel Road? Say it loud - ulica (ul.) and be proud!  <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/83.31.215.66|83.31.215.66]] ([[User talk:83.31.215.66|talk]]) 20:01, 2 September 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
+== academic sourcing ==
+this article is lacking credible sources. it is clearly a very important topic and by making bold claims-- such as gang rape in a cancer ward-- without real evidence we are only weakening the over all article and the injustice it seeks to disclose.
+a personal website about wwii is not a credible source. george duncan is a nobody, and while he may have done valuable research that reseacrh needs to be cited, not him.