Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/West Coast Gaming: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
*'''Delete''' more or less an online gaming guild/clan, although they carefully step around using those terms in the actual article (if they had, it likely would have been speedy deleted). Biggst claim to notability is "''has its own website and forum''". No reliable sources, extremely unlikely any exist or ever will. [[User:Starblind|Andrew Lenahan]] - <b><FONT COLOR="#FF0000">St</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FF5500">ar</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FF8000">bli</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FFC000">nd</FONT></b> 15:31, 25 November 2009 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' more or less an online gaming guild/clan, although they carefully step around using those terms in the actual article (if they had, it likely would have been speedy deleted). Biggst claim to notability is "''has its own website and forum''". No reliable sources, extremely unlikely any exist or ever will. [[User:Starblind|Andrew Lenahan]] - <b><FONT COLOR="#FF0000">St</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FF5500">ar</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FF8000">bli</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FFC000">nd</FONT></b> 15:31, 25 November 2009 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''': I can't find significant coverage for this [[WP:WEB|website]]. [[User:Joe Chill|Joe Chill]] ([[User talk:Joe Chill|talk]]) 21:36, 25 November 2009 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''': I can't find significant coverage for this [[WP:WEB|website]]. [[User:Joe Chill|Joe Chill]] ([[User talk:Joe Chill|talk]]) 21:36, 25 November 2009 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' I can't find any significant coverage either- unless there are some I'm missing, I think this should be deleted [[Special:Contributions/137.73.68.56|137.73.68.56]] ([[User talk:137.73.68.56|talk]]) 12:30, 26 November 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 12:30, 26 November 2009
- West Coast Gaming (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable gaming community group; doesn't appear to meet notability guidelines. A gaming community that hasn't received any kind of third-party coverage (that I can find) doesn't need an article. SMC (talk) 07:20, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. —SMC (talk) 07:20, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. —SMC (talk) 07:20, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions. —SMC (talk) 07:20, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
- Delete more or less an online gaming guild/clan, although they carefully step around using those terms in the actual article (if they had, it likely would have been speedy deleted). Biggst claim to notability is "has its own website and forum". No reliable sources, extremely unlikely any exist or ever will. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 15:31, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
- Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this website. Joe Chill (talk) 21:36, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
- Delete I can't find any significant coverage either- unless there are some I'm missing, I think this should be deleted 137.73.68.56 (talk) 12:30, 26 November 2009 (UTC)