User talk:24.206.86.159: Difference between revisions
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
[[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to [[:Bo Dietl]]. Your edits appear to constitute [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]] and have been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]]. If you would like to experiment, please use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-vandalism2 --> [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 16:07, 18 November 2009 (UTC) |
[[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to [[:Bo Dietl]]. Your edits appear to constitute [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]] and have been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]]. If you would like to experiment, please use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-vandalism2 --> [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 16:07, 18 November 2009 (UTC) |
||
:''If this is a shared [[IP address]], and you didn't make the edit, consider [[Wikipedia:Why create an account?|creating an account]] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.'' |
:''If this is a shared [[IP address]], and you didn't make the edit, consider [[Wikipedia:Why create an account?|creating an account]] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.'' |
||
My reply to you: |
|||
Your characterization of my Bo Dietl edit as VANDALISM when (1) I quoted a website that has images and text of his racist behavior was very much evident and (2) the facts are STILL in the page anyways, under a registered user and folded into another paragraph, is completely spurious. There is nothing in the text I placed that can be characterized as an unsubstantiated personal attack on Mr. Dietl, and to be blunt, your excise of that line I placed is nothing short of whitewash of a man who went on national television while I was watching it and made racist gestuers and commentary. |
|||
My response to your message to me is two upraised fingers or one, depending on country of origin and personal preference. I suggest you take into consideration the hard facts next time and resist the impulse to act with both haste and imprudence. |
|||
Revision as of 05:08, 2 December 2009
November 2009
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Bo Dietl. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 16:07, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
My reply to you:
Your characterization of my Bo Dietl edit as VANDALISM when (1) I quoted a website that has images and text of his racist behavior was very much evident and (2) the facts are STILL in the page anyways, under a registered user and folded into another paragraph, is completely spurious. There is nothing in the text I placed that can be characterized as an unsubstantiated personal attack on Mr. Dietl, and to be blunt, your excise of that line I placed is nothing short of whitewash of a man who went on national television while I was watching it and made racist gestuers and commentary.
My response to your message to me is two upraised fingers or one, depending on country of origin and personal preference. I suggest you take into consideration the hard facts next time and resist the impulse to act with both haste and imprudence.