User talk:Abecedare

.

India

Thanks. I actually did not know that there was an Europa version. Otherwise, i would not have added a pic of Nano Europa. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nikkul (talk • contribs)

Hello, wise administrator

Original post is here but you may not have to read it. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:John_Carter#Emergency_question

Someone (RaseaC) did not like an article so they requested redirect and page protection of the redirect. I wrote a comment on their user talk page. They removed it but then put it back after he edited my original comment (this is funny..editing someone else's talk page comment). They said I could either remove it or ask that he respond.

In response, I made a small edit of his edit of my original comment. This is what I added: (AK=Amanda Knox)

A word of advice, consider not writing "There is no real argument for AK to have her own article" when it is possible that some may have some points for having the article. That's why there's an AFD process not a deletion process where one user can simply declare "I've thought it over and there is no real argument to keep, therefore delete"

The user then says that I am violating WP:CIVILITY and removes my entire comment, says I don't know how WP works and does not want discussion.

I am very much in support of polite discussion. If you think there was a violation of civility, please let me know. I ask you because of your wisdom. Thank you. Suomi Finland 2009 (talk) 22:27, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

I don't read your comment as uncivil. That said, on wikipedia, it is often better to drop issues and move on, especially when the concerns are not directly related to article content. Abecedare (talk) 03:33, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for your wise advice about moving on. I wanted a second opinion about civility, which you kindly gave. Suomi Finland 2009 (talk) 17:45, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

some dude is ...

trying to delete some graphs I made for a discussion on the India page or it might have been an RfC on the India page. Unfortunately, this is an impossibly busy and stressful time for me, so I'm unable to do much. I was wondering if you could look into it. The charts are on a talk page. People do this routinely to express opinion on talk pages. For example, YellowMonkey has made many graphs for FAR discussions. Apparently, people have nothing better to do than to dredge up stuff from 2 or 3 years ago. Fowler&fowler«Talk» 20:25, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

I have readded the tag since you as the uploader should not remove them - however you have nothing to worry about, since the images are not going to be deleted in any case. You can see the note I added on the talk page of the images for the context of why they were nominated in the first place. By the way, I may have been inadvertently and partially responsible for this additional stress, since I told the tagger that he should inform you about the speedy deletion. Anyway the upshot of all this convoluted mess is: as far as the images go, adopt Alfred E. Neuman's motto. :-) Abecedare (talk) 21:43, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

Thanks! I've deleted my post, which as you wisely observed, was written in haste and anger. Fowler&fowler«Talk» 22:01, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

RFA

SpacemanSpiff is involved in some India related articles. He has a RFA. I have not voted yes or no. Suomi Finland 2009 (talk) 19:32, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

I know. Abecedare (talk) 19:52, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Oops, you started it! I knew that Spaceman was not a troublemaker so that passes the first criteria. I looked at the support votes and didn't see your name. Oops, I didn't look high enough to see the nomination. Suomi Finland 2009 (talk) 23:33, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

WOW!

". Wikipedia will be banned from India and hence it will lose 1/6th of world's leaders." - is that anonymous editor someone high up in the Indian government or Hindu religion? Maybe just a person with delusions of grandeur? *shakes head* wow... just wow... Alatari (talk) 01:49, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Shalin 99 (talk) 15:54, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Where should I add (Shalin 99 (talk) 15:54, 8 December 2009 (UTC)) in the page?

Only messages on talk pages (such as this one) need to be signed, and you can do so by adding ~~~~ at the end of any talkpage comment. Abecedare (talk) 15:57, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

2,600 dead bodies found in Kashmir.

I add this news on wikipedia Kashmir topics. http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091202/ap_on_re_as/as_kashmir_nameless_graves So please dont delete it.Because news is not small.Deaths are in thousands.If my edit is wrong then please correct it,Please make refrence number and put news in refrence. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mujahid1947 (talk • contribs) 16:38, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

I don't even have the articles you edited on my wathlist, and wouldn't have noticed your edits. But since you pointed them out, I took a look and noticed that you were misrepresnting the source. Feel free to discuss the issue on the talk page to determine if and how the content can be appropriately included. Abecedare (talk) 17:16, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Re: RFA supports

Fair enough, if that's general policy. It just seemed a bit redundant to me, and the timing was suspect (given the WP:100). And yeah, right, I believe you and RP didn't coordinate that one :-) BTW, have added my support separately. Regards, SBC-YPR (talk) 15:19, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Aryabhatta heliocentric model

Please see the Talk page on Arybhatta,Also wanted to there is a section heliocentrism in aryabhatta page .— Preceding unsigned comment added by Alokprasad (talk • contribs) 19:42, December 9, 2009 (UTC)

Replied at Talk:Aryabhata. Abecedare (talk) 03:19, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

New email

You have it.— Dædαlus ^Contribs 23:06, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

The issue has been resolved for now at ANI. That said, Daedalus, it would be advisable for you to not get involved in matters concerning User:Radiopathy and let other editors handle the concerns. Cheers. Abecedare (talk) 03:17, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

You don't have to worry about that, as, as said in the email, I will not participate in any discussions, or edit any involved articles.— Dædαlus ^Contribs 05:07, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. Abecedare (talk) 05:26, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Rishabha (hindu sage)

An anon repeatedly adding Rishabha was an avatar of Krishna, not vishnu. I reverted him twice, so i am not reverting again. Please see, I have started a discussion on the talk. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 05:28, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Let a message on the IPs talk page; lets see how it responds. Of course, the vedabse translation is not a good source for such information, except as a source of ISKCON"S view. Abecedare (talk) 05:35, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

already left a discussion link on the ip's talk. Priyanath has reverted the ip's edits. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 06:46, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Chennai and Mumbai

Can you take a look? "formerly known as" being changed to "alternatively known as" repetitively. I still use Madras and Bombay, but it is formerly...I've reverted a couple of times on Chennai and once on Mumbai, but would rather not anymore. cheers. -SpacemanSpiff 07:46, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

You just beat me on both occasions! :) Aaroncrick (talk) Review me! 10:23, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Reverted and warned. Lets see if it returns and discusses the issue this time. Abecedare (talk) 12:54, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Hi

I am New User On wiki Please Help me to create a new article! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pyaara Dil (talk • contribs) 14:35, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talkpage. Abecedare (talk) 14:43, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

help

((helpme))

i need help uploading image i dont know where to upload image and how!