Talk:Creativity: Difference between revisions

	; Archives (Index) ;
	1; 2;
	This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 22:49, 25 December 2009

Psychology Unassessed

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Creativity is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
September 5, 2006	Featured article candidate	Not promoted

Philosophy: Aesthetics / Ethics Start‑class

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Aesthetics
	Ethics

What happened to my changes?

Having just completed a graduate level course on creativity and innovation, I do not understand why the changes I made to this article yesterday were all removed. I provided detailed documentation to outstanding work in the field. What's more, as it stands, this article is actually fairly choppy and in some respects, poor, leaving out important work on creativity while including work that is trivial. I'm going to re-enter my changes, and I hope they stick this time. I would be happy to defend these changes with anyone who is actually well trained in this area. Sincerely, Cbrookca (talk) 22:10, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

MrOllie needs to state objective reasons for deleting my additions

Apparently my very careful additions were undone by "MrOllie." Please note that all of the additions were well documented and referred to outstanding scientific journals (including Science and Nature) and books published by major publishers. What's more, my additions are drawn from material in the prestigious Encyclopedia of Creativity, published by Academic Press in 1999. MrOllie: Please state your objective reasons for undoing my additions. If not, I will (a) submit this matter for arbitration and (b) based on your previous history, take steps to have you banned from Wikipedia. (I realize that you'll simply reappear under a new name, but there's nothing I can do about that.) Cbrookca (talk) 22:49, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 22: / Line 22: @@
 Having just completed a graduate level course on creativity and innovation, I do not understand why the changes I made to this article yesterday were all removed.  I provided detailed documentation to outstanding work in the field.  What's more, as it stands, this article is actually fairly choppy and in some respects, poor, leaving out important work on creativity while including work that is trivial.  I'm going to re-enter my changes, and I hope they stick this time.  I would be happy to defend these changes with anyone who is actually well trained in this area.  Sincerely, [[User:Cbrookca|Cbrookca]] ([[User talk:Cbrookca|talk]]) 22:10, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
+== MrOllie needs to state objective reasons for deleting my additions ==
+Apparently my very careful additions were undone by "MrOllie."  Please note that all of the additions were well documented and referred to outstanding scientific journals (including ''Science'' and ''Nature'') and books published by major publishers.  What's more, my additions are drawn from material in the prestigious ''Encyclopedia of Creativity'', published by Academic Press in 1999.  MrOllie:  Please state your '''objective reasons''' for undoing my additions.  If not, I will (a) submit this matter for arbitration and (b) based on your previous history, take steps to have you banned from Wikipedia.  (I realize that you'll simply reappear under a new name, but there's nothing I can do about that.)  [[User:Cbrookca|Cbrookca]] ([[User talk:Cbrookca|talk]]) 22:49, 25 December 2009 (UTC)