Jump to content

Neonatal sepsis: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
split from sepsis
 
move diagnosis from sepsis
Line 17: Line 17:
It is difficult to clinically exclude sepsis in newborns less than 90 days old that have fever (defined as a temperature > 38°C (100.4°F). Except in the case of obvious acute viral [[bronchiolitis]], the current practice in newborns less than 30 days old is to perform a complete workup including [[complete blood count]] with differential, blood culture, [[urinalysis]], urine culture, and [[cerebrospinal fluid]](CSF) studies and CSF culture, admit the newborn to the hospital, and treat empirically for serious bacterial infection for at least 48 hours until cultures are demonstrated to show no growth. Attempts have been made to see whether it is possible to risk stratify newborns in order to decide if a newborn can be safely monitored at home without treatment despite having a fever. One such attempt is the Rochester criteria.
It is difficult to clinically exclude sepsis in newborns less than 90 days old that have fever (defined as a temperature > 38°C (100.4°F). Except in the case of obvious acute viral [[bronchiolitis]], the current practice in newborns less than 30 days old is to perform a complete workup including [[complete blood count]] with differential, blood culture, [[urinalysis]], urine culture, and [[cerebrospinal fluid]](CSF) studies and CSF culture, admit the newborn to the hospital, and treat empirically for serious bacterial infection for at least 48 hours until cultures are demonstrated to show no growth. Attempts have been made to see whether it is possible to risk stratify newborns in order to decide if a newborn can be safely monitored at home without treatment despite having a fever. One such attempt is the Rochester criteria.


==Risk factors==
A study performed at Strong Memorial Hospital in [[Rochester, New York]], showed that infants ≤ 60 days old meeting the following criteria were at low-risk for having a serious bacterial illness<ref name="pmid4067741">{{cite journal |author=Dagan R, Powell KR, Hall CB, Menegus MA |title=Identification of infants unlikely to have serious bacterial infection although hospitalized for suspected sepsis |journal=J. Pediatr. |volume=107 |issue=6 |pages=855–60 |year=1985 |month=Dec |pmid=4067741 |url=http://www.jpeds.com/article/S0022-3476(85)80175-X/abstract |doi=10.1016/S0022-3476(85)80175-X}}</ref>:
A study performed at Strong Memorial Hospital in [[Rochester, New York]], showed that infants ≤ 60 days old meeting the following criteria were at low-risk for having a serious bacterial illness<ref name="pmid4067741">{{cite journal |author=Dagan R, Powell KR, Hall CB, Menegus MA |title=Identification of infants unlikely to have serious bacterial infection although hospitalized for suspected sepsis |journal=J. Pediatr. |volume=107 |issue=6 |pages=855–60 |year=1985 |month=Dec |pmid=4067741 |url=http://www.jpeds.com/article/S0022-3476(85)80175-X/abstract |doi=10.1016/S0022-3476(85)80175-X}}</ref>:


Line 35: Line 36:


Those meeting these criteria likely do not require a lumbar puncture, and are felt to be safe for discharge home without antibiotic treatment, or with a single dose of intramuscular antibiotics, but will still require close outpatient follow-up.
Those meeting these criteria likely do not require a lumbar puncture, and are felt to be safe for discharge home without antibiotic treatment, or with a single dose of intramuscular antibiotics, but will still require close outpatient follow-up.

==Diagnosis==
neonatal sepsis screening:

1.DLC showing increased numbers of polymorphs.
2.DLC: band cells> 20%
3.increased haptoglobins
4.micro ESR titre: >55mm
5.gastric aspirate showing > 5 polymorphs per high power field.
6.newborn CSF screen: showing increased cells and proteins.
7.suggestive history of chorioamnionitis, PROM, etc...


==References==
==References==

Revision as of 06:19, 3 January 2010

Neonatal sepsis
SpecialtyPediatrics Edit this on Wikidata

In common clinical usage, neonatal sepsis specifically refers to the presence of a serious bacterial infection (SBI) (such as meningitis, pneumonia, pyelonephritis, or gastroenteritis) in the setting of fever. Criteria with regards to hemodynamic compromise or respiratory failure are not useful clinically because these symptoms often do not arise in neonates until death is imminent and unpreventable.

It is difficult to clinically exclude sepsis in newborns less than 90 days old that have fever (defined as a temperature > 38°C (100.4°F). Except in the case of obvious acute viral bronchiolitis, the current practice in newborns less than 30 days old is to perform a complete workup including complete blood count with differential, blood culture, urinalysis, urine culture, and cerebrospinal fluid(CSF) studies and CSF culture, admit the newborn to the hospital, and treat empirically for serious bacterial infection for at least 48 hours until cultures are demonstrated to show no growth. Attempts have been made to see whether it is possible to risk stratify newborns in order to decide if a newborn can be safely monitored at home without treatment despite having a fever. One such attempt is the Rochester criteria.

Risk factors

A study performed at Strong Memorial Hospital in Rochester, New York, showed that infants ≤ 60 days old meeting the following criteria were at low-risk for having a serious bacterial illness[1]:

  • generally well-appearing
  • previously healthy
    • full term (at ≥37 weeks gestation)
    • no antibiotics perinatally
    • no unexplained hyperbilirubinemia that required treatment
    • no antibiotics since discharge
    • no hospitalizations
    • no chronic illness
    • discharged at the same time or before the mother
  • no evidence of skin, soft tissue, bone, joint, or ear infection
  • WBC count 5,000-15,000/mm3
  • absolute band count ≤ 1,500/mm3
  • urine WBC count ≤ 10 per high power field (hpf)
  • stool WBC count ≤ 5 per high power field (hpf) only in infants with diarrhea

Those meeting these criteria likely do not require a lumbar puncture, and are felt to be safe for discharge home without antibiotic treatment, or with a single dose of intramuscular antibiotics, but will still require close outpatient follow-up.

Diagnosis

neonatal sepsis screening:

1.DLC showing increased numbers of polymorphs. 2.DLC: band cells> 20% 3.increased haptoglobins 4.micro ESR titre: >55mm 5.gastric aspirate showing > 5 polymorphs per high power field. 6.newborn CSF screen: showing increased cells and proteins. 7.suggestive history of chorioamnionitis, PROM, etc...

References

  1. ^ Dagan R, Powell KR, Hall CB, Menegus MA (1985). "Identification of infants unlikely to have serious bacterial infection although hospitalized for suspected sepsis". J. Pediatr. 107 (6): 855–60. doi:10.1016/S0022-3476(85)80175-X. PMID 4067741. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)