Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Little Street of Vermeer and its Location: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 14:01, 10 January 2010

The Little Street of Vermeer and its Location

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Very puffy, non-neutral tone, seems redundant to existing articles, possible copyvio. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 03:53, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Insufficiently "puffy". Intellectual tone too high for Wikipedia. Subject too serious.--Wetman (talk) 03:59, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - likely to be original research that belongs in an academic journal. - Richard Cavell (talk) 04:08, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Maintain: The reason for keeping the article is that a long-time issue has been solved now and is of interest for historians and fans of Vermeer. The issue is not found in the main articles about Vermeer and about the painting. If the text is too puffy, please let me know where to tone down. I just tried to be scientific in order not to be critized for writing unfounded facts!

The mathematical appendix can be transferred to the article about perspective in Wikipedia and a link to that can be given here. Primasz (talk) 14:01, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 :Insufficiently "puffy". Intellectual tone too high for Wikipedia. Subject too serious.--[[User:Wetman|Wetman]] ([[User talk:Wetman|talk]]) 03:59, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
 *'''Delete''' - likely to be original research that belongs in an academic journal. - [[User:Richardcavell|Richard Cavell]] ([[User talk:Richardcavell|talk]]) 04:08, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
+::'''Maintain''': The reason for keeping the article is that a long-time issue has been solved now and is of interest for historians and fans of Vermeer. The issue is not found in the main articles about Vermeer and about the painting. If the text is too puffy, please let me know where to tone down. I just tried to be scientific in order not to be critized for writing unfounded facts!
+<br>The mathematical appendix can be transferred to the article about perspective in Wikipedia and a link to that can be given here. [[User:Primasz|Primasz]] ([[User talk:Primasz|talk]]) 14:01, 10 January 2010 (UTC)