Jump to content

Talk:Golden Temple: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎welcome to Viet Nam: removed vandalizm
Line 37: Line 37:
::Ok so how come some of the Gurus names are seperated with two words? I don't get why sometime's it's one word and sometime's it's two then? Is it just the preference of when a person or subject was named? If please you don't mind me asking then here then ? [[Special:Contributions/71.105.87.54|71.105.87.54]] ([[User talk:71.105.87.54|talk]]) 00:57, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
::Ok so how come some of the Gurus names are seperated with two words? I don't get why sometime's it's one word and sometime's it's two then? Is it just the preference of when a person or subject was named? If please you don't mind me asking then here then ? [[Special:Contributions/71.105.87.54|71.105.87.54]] ([[User talk:71.105.87.54|talk]]) 00:57, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
:Some people write them like that, but undoubtedly it is one word for Harmandir. Thanks--[[User:Sikh-history|<em style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:blue;font-size:16px">Sikh-</em><em style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:goldenrod;font-size:16px">History</em>]] 11:27, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
:Some people write them like that, but undoubtedly it is one word for Harmandir. Thanks--[[User:Sikh-history|<em style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:blue;font-size:16px">Sikh-</em><em style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:goldenrod;font-size:16px">History</em>]] 11:27, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

== Completed in 1604? ==

From what I can gather,the temple was destroyed by Ahman Shah forces in 1757. Even this article states that it was "substantialy rebuilt" after this event.Therefore I believe this warrants mention in the facts posted under the picture. " Built; 1585-1604,destroyed and substantialy rebuilt;1757."[[Special:Contributions/76.166.245.241|76.166.245.241]] ([[User talk:76.166.245.241|talk]]) 16:01, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:01, 12 February 2010

WikiProject iconIndia: Punjab Start‑class High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Punjab (India) (assessed as High-importance).
WikiProject iconSikhism Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is part of WikiProject Sikhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Sikhism. Please participate by editing the article, or visit the project page for more details on the projects.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

The image Image:Header1.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --12:12, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Coordinates

The coordinates need the following fixes:

  • Write here

The coord pointer was in the middle of the water. Correct coord are 31.620029°,74.876394°

71.155.149.183 (talk) 22:54, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction section

The introduction section sounds like it's copied straight out of a guide book:

"Please note that there might be changes in the timing as per the season."

I think some should be transferred into the opening paragraph and history while deleting the scheduled times all together.

Is it Harmandir or Har Mandir?

I don't understand why sometimes it's one word? I mean if one guru's name is Har Rai. Or Har Krishn. In Hinduism they might say Har Ram. Or Har Krishn. Or Hari OM.....So....Why is the Temple not Har Mandir? Why is it one word like like then Harmandir? I mean im not trying to fight. Im asking. Ive tried figuring this out before to. 71.105.87.54 (talk) 19:29, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]


This is another reason why I hate wikipedia. I can't make changes cus they tell me its not allowed and if i want to make changes then I should post it on the forum. So I post it on the forum and no one replies then. 71.105.87.54 (talk) 08:35, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The spelling in Punjabi/Gurmukhi script is of one word, not two seperate words hence "Harmandir". Regards --Sikh-History 09:16, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

i hate wikiipedia —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.94.188.188 (talk) 07:02, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok so how come some of the Gurus names are seperated with two words? I don't get why sometime's it's one word and sometime's it's two then? Is it just the preference of when a person or subject was named? If please you don't mind me asking then here then ? 71.105.87.54 (talk) 00:57, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Some people write them like that, but undoubtedly it is one word for Harmandir. Thanks--Sikh-History 11:27, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Completed in 1604?

 From what I can gather,the temple was destroyed by Ahman Shah forces in 1757. Even this article states that it was "substantialy rebuilt" after this event.Therefore I believe this warrants mention in the facts posted under the picture. " Built; 1585-1604,destroyed and substantialy rebuilt;1757."76.166.245.241 (talk) 16:01, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]