Jump to content

User talk:Jim101: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m →‎Battle of Unsan: new section
Line 86: Line 86:
:我在客栈发帖会后跟你说一声,英文维基的材料你可以准备一下,我知道那些艺人粉丝肯定会投反对票,他们有“死忠团”的优势,机会似乎只有一次,我们只能以理服人。麻烦了。--[[Special:Contributions/113.114.204.237|113.114.204.237]] ([[User talk:113.114.204.237|talk]]) 15:17, 21 February 2010 (UTC) <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/113.114.204.237|113.114.204.237]] ([[User talk:113.114.204.237|talk]]) 15:14, 21 February 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:我在客栈发帖会后跟你说一声,英文维基的材料你可以准备一下,我知道那些艺人粉丝肯定会投反对票,他们有“死忠团”的优势,机会似乎只有一次,我们只能以理服人。麻烦了。--[[Special:Contributions/113.114.204.237|113.114.204.237]] ([[User talk:113.114.204.237|talk]]) 15:17, 21 February 2010 (UTC) <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/113.114.204.237|113.114.204.237]] ([[User talk:113.114.204.237|talk]]) 15:14, 21 February 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
::几天后有时间我来看一下这个问题。[[User:Jim101|Jim101]] ([[User talk:Jim101#top|talk]]) 16:07, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
::几天后有时间我来看一下这个问题。[[User:Jim101|Jim101]] ([[User talk:Jim101#top|talk]]) 16:07, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

:好,原本也没打算这样,有这些时间。--[[Special:Contributions/113.114.195.7|113.114.195.7]] ([[User talk:113.114.195.7|talk]]) 01:36, 25 February 2010 (UTC)


==细菌==
==细菌==

Revision as of 01:36, 25 February 2010

Hello, Jim101! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! ~Kylu (u|t) 07:23, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

TomasBat (@)(Contribs)(Sign!) 02:14, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

翻译

对不起,刚才没看见你的请求。如果是广告的话,在英文维基里是一点都不符合知名度条件。列表必须符合知名度条件才能保留,不过最好的办法还是把列表转成句子,然后在看转换完的东西有没有意义。Jim101 (talk) 21:21, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

没关系。可问题是这些商业广告代言的列表是在艺人的条目里面的内容,中文的关注度里只限制条目的建立没限制内容。--113.112.150.173 (talk) 21:33, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
在英文维基里知名度限制条目和内容,因为不合理的比重是关注度指引的一个部分。Jim101 (talk) 21:39, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
[1]英文wiki有这个吗?--113.112.184.63 (talk) 22:06, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
,不过在一般情况下都没有人用,因为不合理的比重和合知名度是一回事,那就是内容和条目都必须靠可供查证方针给证明才能放在维基上。广告在条目里,即使没有被知名度盖住,你也必须用可靠来源来证明这些广告符合不合理的比重条件。Jim101 (talk) 22:18, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
[2][3]中有无相关语句支持?--113.112.202.238 (talk) 19:30, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
2说不违反不合理比重的东西才能放在列表上。3说列表必须"有意义"。 Jim101 (talk) 20:00, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
不过3不是一个好的标准,因为关键字是"有没有意义"。条件太松。Jim101 (talk) 20:16, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

不过最后还是得是做列表的人来证明自己的列表"有意义"。Jim101 (talk) 21:00, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

我在客栈发帖会后跟你说一声,英文维基的材料你可以准备一下,我知道那些艺人粉丝肯定会投反对票,他们有“死忠团”的优势,机会似乎只有一次,我们只能以理服人。麻烦了。--113.114.204.237 (talk) 15:17, 21 February 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 113.114.204.237 (talk) 15:14, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
几天后有时间我来看一下这个问题。Jim101 (talk) 16:07, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
好,原本也没打算这样,有这些时间。--113.114.195.7 (talk) 01:36, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

细菌

新年好,[4]英文有这方面的吗?我准备很快推荐至中文首页“你知道吗?”,就快完工,不知有其他方面的说法?欢迎你编辑一下。--113.112.208.105 (talk) 20:09, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

拜年了。官方面来说,美国从来没有使用过细菌战。联合国军历史从来没有提起这个事。很多历史学家说这是共产党在撒谎。Jim101 (talk) 21:37, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
在朝鲜战争细菌战的条目已经弄好了,还是谢谢!
关于试行[5],邀请投票,无论你的意见是什么。--113.112.177.215 (talk) 22:00, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
[6]的条目已经弄好了,还是谢谢!过年小红包[7],祝早生小维基人。--113.113.137.165 (talk) 20:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have copy-edited this article, and now I have nominated it for Good Article status and can help with the process. I haven't started working on Battle of the Ch'ongch'on River and it could be awhile before I get to that one. I would recommend you try to find someone else to edit it more thoroughly in the meantime. —Ed!(talk) 20:38, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]