Talk:Alice in Wonderland (2010 film)

Alice poster

I seem to recall there previously being a theatrical poster featuring Alice and the White Rabbit wandering through a Wonderland landscape, with the Mad Hatter's tea table in the background. It's really trivial, but would it not be more appropriate to continue using this poster instead of that which is currently to the right of the main page? It is, after all, Alice in Wonderland, not Johnny Depp in Wonderland. Flamingopuree (talk) 14:32, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

"unimpressed"

I changed a previous sentence that indicated that Burton was "unimpressed" with previous film versions of Alice. The quote in the reference is: "I don't know; I've never seen a version where I feel like they got it all."
I've altered the article to indicate that Burton felt that other adaptations were incomplete, which is closer to his words.
I don't know if Burton would want to say that he had been unimpressed by an adaptation of the quality of Svankmajer's Neco z Alenky, for example. Aryder779 (talk) 02:07, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

And he feels this adaptation will have "got it all"...? Just another example of a British classic being cannibalised by Hollywood. Unimpressed is right... Đɨℓʊŋα^χχν 01:02, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Citations

• Tristan Nichols (2008-09-16). "Alice filming starts in Torpoint". The Herald. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
• Borys Kit; Carolyn Giardina (2008-09-24). "Johnny Depp in deep with Disney". The Hollywood Reporter. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
• Shalabh Anand Bajpai (2008-10-26). "Daniel Craig: Indian films another feather in cap". MeriNews.

Cast and Characters

I hope everyone does not mind me coming on here and adding people that I have noticed have been cast, notably, Christopher Lee and Tim Pigott-Smith, who only announced privately on their personal webpages. I am just trying to keep myself busy as I await the film. I have no idea how to make a wikipedia page or acquaint myself with others providing information, but I thought it'd make a fine hobby to just pop on and provide properly cited information. As well as keeping eyes peeled for casted actors, I will be adding character descriptions if that is okay.  :) Karloffornia (talk) 22:35, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Daniel Craig removed from cast

I've removed him because the reference provided was from Merinews, a site which relies on user generated content, and thus there is no way to ensure the reliability of an interview posted there. The interview is also fake, the fact that the original author and original place of publication were not specified should be enough reason not to report this as fact. However, it also treats Vesper Lynd as the name of the actress (Eva Green) rather than the character, and it contains several chronological errors. For example Craig states he will begin filming on Flashbacks of a Fool next month, then goes on to say that he'll star alongside Anne Hathaway in Alice in Wonderland. Yet, Flashbacks of a Fool was released in the U.K. in April, before Hathaway was ever attached to Alice. The interview also has Craig mentioning The Jacket as one of his upcoming projects although that film was released before Casino Royale. Aurum ore (talk) 20:17, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

I see: I just checked the cite Wildroot added and must say it is an atrocious article. Alientraveller (talk) 20:25, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

Hey, it's an understandable mistake. I almost forwarded it to one of the editors at a movie site before I noticed all the errors. Aurum ore (talk) 20:31, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

Woops! Wildroot (talk) 21:07, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Poster of Mad Hatter

Whomever keeps deleting the poster of the mad hatter in the "Cast" section, STOP IT! there is no reason to not have it on the wikipedia page!

(Moviedude346 (talk) 02:39, 17 January 2010 (UTC))

Hi! (I'm NOT the one deleting the picture... infact i havent even edited the page AT ALL) I DO want to say, though, that the picture of the mad hatter keeps being moved to the 'marketing' section by some other guy... and personally i think that is where it belongs.

I cant wait for the movie to come out!!!!!!!!!!!!! WOOT! lol --♫ Chris-B-Koolio ♫ ... (Talk) 15:45, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

I also believe it belongs in the Charcter section, but a moderator keeps moving it so our opinion really doesnt matter :(

(Moviedude346 (talk) 21:53, 18 January 2010 (UTC))

Writer's Strike

The article reads: "The film was originally to be released in 2009, but was pushed to March 19, 2010", and "The original start date was May 2008, but filming did not begin until September".

I think it's safe to say this was because of the 2007–2008 Writers Guild of America strike. What does everyone else think? Wildroot (talk) 00:20, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

I really don't think so. The Writer's Strike were mostly writer's from TV, not movies. Movie writers get paid shitloads. TV writers are paid some soup and a pittance. (The pittance was negociated in the writer's strike and they earned it.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.226.196.163 (talk) 06:33, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Stephen Fry Source?

Where exactly on that page does it say Stephen Fry will indeed play the cat? 194.78.37.122 (talk) 12:47, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Yes...the same with Lee, Taylor, Windsor etc....This is all rumored information that I found on The Tim Burton Collective, that was later posted by me on IMBD for analyzing and a Johnny Depp website later posted it as news. This might need some fixing...unless someone has an actual source. --Karloffornia (talk) 07:40, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Red Queen or Queen of Hearts?

According to the wikipedia article for ((Red Queen)) these two are commonly mistaken for eachother. The Red Queen does not appear in Wonderland but in Looking Glass. It may be that Burton's film blends the two characters but just a thought. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.11.198.174 (talk) 12:52, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

It's red queen in this film. Alientraveller (talk) 18:00, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

It is a combination of the two. She is referred to as the Red Queen but is accented in hearts and is the ruler of the hearts (i.e. the Knave). See photograph: http://comingsoon.net/nextraimages/aliceusatoday2.jpg 12.162.122.6 (talk) 20:22, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Pictures

should we add the leaked pictures of the characters?

I also have the title logo for the film, should I include that to the box on the right? Josemrdj (talk) 03:46, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

I'm not sure if leaked pictures (like the ones found here) are able to be added to the article, but I'm almost positive a title/logo could be added to the article. [[::User:Duchess of Bathwick|Duchess of Bathwick]] (talk · contribs) 19:03, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Film studios

Is it true that the film would also be distrubuted by Touchstone Pictures? The company name was included in the distribution and studio sections of the film infobox. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Linkyblinky (talk • contribs) 09:10, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

Alice's age

I've changed Alice's age from 17 to 19. it says that she's 19 on the official page...

Stop changing Alice's age..!

The reference clearly says that Alice is 19 years old...

Am I...

Am I the only one that would only watch this movie if it was rated PG-14? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brando26000 (talk • contribs) 02:48, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

No you are not, hun. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.226.196.163 (talk) 06:36, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Alice was seven

Alice may be 19 in this movie, but in the origenal books she was 7. So 12 years have passed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Evil Little Fangirl (talk • contribs) 23:17, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Actually, Alice was seven and a half in the second book. Seems insignificant, but Carroll has accentuated her age in both books.

Summary

Who keeps changing the summary? Do not add to this page unless you have a source. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Josemrdj (talk • contribs) 02:39, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

New Poster

I have uploaded a new poster. It's an official Theatrical poster. DO NOT CHANGE IT. I think it better represents Tim Burton's vision of the book better than Alice standing on an over-sized tea cup, don't you think? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Josemrdj (talk • contribs) 03:22, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Screenplay draft leaked.

I assume everyone knows that the first draft of the film has popped up on the internet, and should it be mentioned? You read see it here: http://www.docstoc.com/docs/8742387/Alice-In-Wonderland-Screenplay Evilgidgit (talk) 18:33, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

• Are you sure that it's *REAL* ? Princess-pink95 (talk) 20:41, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

• • I doubt words like "ass" will be in a family movie. ;-) --Red-Blue-White (talk) 15:37, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

• • • That's the actual screenplay alright, though, I'm sure it's been ammended a few times since it's original printing in February 2007. Also, words like "ass" have been used in a ton of "family" films, and being that this is a Burton piece, I don't doubt at all that such language may be used.

New Trailer

...So,yeah, 1 or 2 new trailers came out. The first one was mentioned, should these be mentioned to? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Evil Little Fangirl (talk • contribs) 04:29, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

STOP CHANGING THE POSTER!

Stop adding the Mad Hatter poster to the page. It's called ALICE in Wonderland. The Alice version has the Mad Hatter sitting on the end of this table, so we can use that one (which better represents the movie). Just because iTunes used the image, it doesn't mean that it's the official poster. Just in case you guys don't know, the two released teasers are from the Hatter's point of view.

So let's just leave the Alice poster until the official Theatrical Poster is released. Josemrdj (talk) 22:13, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

The trailers aren't form the Hatter's point of view, they're just narrated by him(there's a difference). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Evil Little Fangirl (talk • contribs) 01:39, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Links that could be helpful

I just cleaned up the article (refs, format, etc) and noticed these links listed under the EL. They probably could useful somewhere in the prose, so I'm going to list them here instead.

• First look photos from the film from The Huffington Post
• Pictures of filming in Cornwall, England

—Mike Allen 01:49, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

American McGee's Alice

Does anyone know if this has any relationship or similarities to American Mcgee Alice in Wonderland game?? User talk:Orangatuan —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.9.187.65 (talk) 19:47, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

It doesn't have any relation, except the basic Alice's story, characters and that. The game was a "proposed" sequel, set in a darkened Wonderland. The film it's another reinterpretation of the Alice mythos.

PICTURES!

There are images from the movie of most of the charcters (Cheshire cat, alice, Red queen) on their wikipedia pages. Should any of them be added here?

(Moviedude346 (talk) 21:53, 18 January 2010 (UTC))

Alice - Avril Lavigne

It's not 3.01. It's 3.34. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.249.164.210 (talk) 14:12, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

Freakishly long

Why is this article so freakishly long? It's almost twice the length of some Oscar-winning films, and that makes it harder to actually get the useful information. Do we have some guidelines on this? Or people can just keep adding details as long as they cite their sources. - Artoasis (talk) 14:21, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

It's only 36 kilobytes long. Going by this it's not "long". Changeling, which is a FA, is "long"—it's 120 kilobytes. I think the soundtrack could be merged into its own article, it takes up a lot of space. When the film is released, then the cast can be included in the plot section, and the casting information can be added to a "Casting" section under "Production". A cast list is rarely used for FAs, it takes up too much space and leaves too much white, and it's better in prose. —Mike Allen 16:54, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. I posted this 'cuz for an upcoming movie, I usually look for who's who in the cast and overall critical response. But this one makes it real hard to glance over the "cast" section without catching some "characters" spoilers. I'm afraid when the movie come out, it's gonna get much longer with people on each side trying to add positive/negative reviews. Anyhow, thanks for addressing my concern. - Artoasis (talk) 01:17, 12 February 2010 (UTC)