Jump to content

Talk:GMail Drive: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 23: Line 23:


:I know this for a fact. Your login information is in no way tranmitted to this "third party". The sentence was removed.--[[User:Laboye|Eddie]] 20:31, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
:I know this for a fact. Your login information is in no way tranmitted to this "third party". The sentence was removed.--[[User:Laboye|Eddie]] 20:31, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

== SUBST? ==

There's a sentence "...but does not give an actual drive letter, such as C:, preventing its use in all DOS applications, and some older Windows applications" ; wouldn't using the DOS command subst nicely fix that "problem"?

Revision as of 23:08, 3 March 2010

NPOV

Most of this article is fine, but it's obviously POV with the sentence "Gmail Drive is easy to use". I know it's a tiny thing but an encyclopaedia is not there to to give opinions on things, only to give facts. Could someone please change it to something a little less opinionated? -- Ukdragon37 21:18, 20 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

easy enough. I removed the sentence (you can do that, too). I also altered the article to 3rd person. — Lomn | Talk / RfC 21:24, 20 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
What's with the section labeled "Warning"? It doesn't seem particularly encyclopedic.--Frenchman113 19:38, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect warning

This is incorrect, I think:

Hence, a GMail Drive-user will be sharing his/her GMail account details with this third party.

Who is the third party? The software is provided by a third party but the GMail a/c details are not communicated to any third party. Paul Beardsell 21:39, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I know this for a fact. Your login information is in no way tranmitted to this "third party". The sentence was removed.--Eddie 20:31, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

SUBST?

There's a sentence "...but does not give an actual drive letter, such as C:, preventing its use in all DOS applications, and some older Windows applications" ; wouldn't using the DOS command subst nicely fix that "problem"?