User talk:Slakr: Difference between revisions
MiszaBot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 2 thread(s) (older than 7d) to User talk:Slakr/Archive 14. |
No edit summary |
||
Line 88: | Line 88: | ||
Please review this file as deleting it is a very lazy way of not being impartial. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/90.152.0.2|90.152.0.2]] ([[User talk:90.152.0.2|talk]]) 11:32, 12 March 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
Please review this file as deleting it is a very lazy way of not being impartial. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/90.152.0.2|90.152.0.2]] ([[User talk:90.152.0.2|talk]]) 11:32, 12 March 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
== Propsoal To Promote wp:quote == |
|||
Hello, this is a friendly notification. |
|||
In the past, you supported promoting [[wp:quote]] into [[wp:policy and guideline|protocol]]. Currently, there is a [[Wikipedia_talk:Quotations#Proposal_To_Upgrade_This_Into_Protocol|discussion]] in an attempt to gather consensus to this ratification. |
|||
If you are interested, you can show your support there. |
|||
Thank you.[[Special:Contributions/174.3.110.108|174.3.110.108]] ([[User talk:174.3.110.108|talk]]) 02:24, 13 March 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 02:24, 13 March 2010
Ideally, please use this link to post new messages at the bottom. If you can't find something you recently posted, I might have moved it down there or it could have been archived if you posted it over 7 days ago. Cheers :)
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
(ok sorry)194.83.96.153 (talk) 14:01, 4 February 2010 (UTC)--194.83.96.153 (talk) 14:01, 4 February 2010 (UTC)--194.83.96.153 (talk) 14:01, 4 February 2010 (UTC) bobby
Sinebot marking edits minor
Sinebot marked this edit as minor, which hid it from my watchlist. Kind of annoying - I saw the bar appear on my watchlist and no edit to User talk:Gwern, and had to ponder for a minute before I realized why that was so. Perhaps user talk edits should not be marked minor. --Gwern (contribs) 14:33 15 February 2010 (GMT)
Edit war
Hi there.
Thanks for a taking a look at my post on the 3RR board. You closed it as protected, but I think we need a different solution.
As I see it, there are two problems as things stand. First, the user has been edit warring on both Drum and Drum kit, but only Drum has been granted page protection. The edit warring is continuing at Drum kit, although it has died down in the past two days while everyone waited for action from 3RR.
Second, full page protection seems to be overkill for a page that is only being abused by a single user. No one can make even grammatical changes until the protection lapses, and when it does lapse, the user in question has clearly stated that he plans to disregard consensus and 3RR.
I hope you'll take another look and reconsider.
Thanks. — Bdb484 (talk) 19:07, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
- Don't know if you're still too busy with real life to take a look at this, but I've reposted the notice now that the page protection has lapsed. The offending user has, of course, returned to continue the edit war. — Bdb484 (talk) 14:24, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
WHYRobertbigenho (talk) 00:07, 8 March 2010 (UTC)Robertbigenho
I wanna know why dis gay dude deleted my fucking article
- Hmm, Plant Music? The main reason was, of course, that it was an obvious hoax and/or was vandalism. Apart from that, it was my pet fern that told me to. It heard through the grapevine that none of the other ferns knew of the music to which the article referred. Then again, the grapevine and/or my fern might be lying to me (much like they did that one time when they misled me into thinking that they would make beets taste yummier if I left a dime-bag of fertilizer under the fern). So, if you feel that an error was made, feel free to suggest undeletion. --slakr\ talk / 14:18, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
Then we have
as for pet fwerns and dudes - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citra_Indah_Residence - 9 month free advertising - what would you do? (user name and name and phone number at bottom of art :( ) SatuSuro 13:44, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
- Zapped. For obvious spam/advertising like that, in the future feel free to simply tag it with
{{db-spam}}
. --slakr\ talk / 14:15, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
Hi, so considering I wrote the article, I don't understand how it could be copyright infringement. Could you perhaps help me put the article together please? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Smittysaint (talk • contribs) 17:06, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
- In that case, it would also meet criteria for speedy deletion - blatant advertising due to its overwhelmingly promotional tone. I would also highly suggest that you read our spamming, conflict of interest, and your first article guidelines. --slakr\ talk / 06:12, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
Oi.
Give me an archive of my article, I need to show it to someone. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dilsl (talk • contribs) 00:02, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
You deleted my contribution on Abdul Wahab Corporation
Why ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.155.19.14 (talk) 08:14, 12 March 2010 (UTC) Please help me on this . I am Doctor from Karachi Pakistan associated in educating the hazards of mining and mineral milling . —Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.155.19.14 (talk) 08:15, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
Why delete a valid account of ' Mark Boardman '
Hello,
I wish to note that a very worthy page on a notable person was deleted. The relevant sources were checked and the addition of Mark Boardman page has all the details relevant to the page. He is a TV personality and has been on BBC, Channel 4 and runs the promotions for all the UK film premiere and is listed on many websites as a celebrity.
Myself and several other people complied the page and before removing as it was deleted before, for the sake of history add this.
Please review this file as deleting it is a very lazy way of not being impartial. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.152.0.2 (talk) 11:32, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
Propsoal To Promote wp:quote
Hello, this is a friendly notification.
In the past, you supported promoting wp:quote into protocol. Currently, there is a discussion in an attempt to gather consensus to this ratification.
If you are interested, you can show your support there.
Thank you.174.3.110.108 (talk) 02:24, 13 March 2010 (UTC)