Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Civilonenotyou: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 27: Line 27:
<small><span style="font-weight:normal">''See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</span></small>
<small><span style="font-weight:normal">''See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</span></small>
: this individual john blackburne is reverting basic facts on the 13th amendement saying its too much info & providing bogus link to support his claims, i suggest john blackburne to be punished for violations of basic rules & basic logic!
: this individual john blackburne is reverting basic facts on the 13th amendement saying its too much info & providing bogus link to support his claims, i suggest john blackburne to be punished for violations of basic rules & basic logic!
: I added fact on 1865, he did not like that, it's clear this guy is trying to become administrator, blocking me, i dont care if that happens, but users need to look at this individual's real motivations. It's silly to argue on couple of words, yet blackburne does it all the time with other users, his edits must be perfect ofcourse!
: I added fact on 1865, he did not like that, it's clear this guy is trying to become administrator, blocking me, i dont care if that happens, but users need to look at this individual's real motivations. It's silly to argue on couple of words, yet blackburne does it all the time with all other users, his edits must be perfect ofcourse!
: good edits like this are vandalism according to blackburne, warning, this guy should never ever become administrator or anythin else: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Thirteenth_Amendment&diff=350672397&oldid=350664877
: good edits like this are vandalism according to blackburne, warning, this guy should never ever become administrator or anythin else: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Thirteenth_Amendment&diff=350672397&oldid=350664877
<small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Monthandme|Monthandme]] ([[User talk:Monthandme|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Monthandme|contribs]]) 21:48, 18 March 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
<small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Monthandme|Monthandme]] ([[User talk:Monthandme|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Monthandme|contribs]]) 21:48, 18 March 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

Revision as of 22:22, 18 March 2010

Civilonenotyou

Civilonenotyou (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)
Report date March 18 2010, 21:28 (UTC)


Suspected sockpuppets
Evidence submitted by JohnBlackburne

An IP and two accounts whose sole purpose in life seems to be to add surplus information to a DAB page, Thirteenth Amendment, usually ungrammatically, with increasingly annoying edit summaries - lastly mentioning 3RR which of course sockpuppetry neatly sidesteps. The second IP is one which thoughtfully put in a password request for me, 1 minute after the last change. Diffs: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] --JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 21:28, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

both users tried to warn this user not to vandalize, instead of talking about the problem on the talk page as the rules demand, johnblackburne is violating rules 24/7by 3rr and posting here without having courage to talk about it.
I have addressed the content issues on the talk page in more detail, to make it clear why the changes made were wrong.--JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 22:02, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
that is illegal, i can explain same things on anybody's talk page, he simply keeps on making things up, wasting people's time on silly issue, im sure there are more he cant wait to invent!
Comments by accused parties

See Defending yourself against claims.

this individual john blackburne is reverting basic facts on the 13th amendement saying its too much info & providing bogus link to support his claims, i suggest john blackburne to be punished for violations of basic rules & basic logic!
I added fact on 1865, he did not like that, it's clear this guy is trying to become administrator, blocking me, i dont care if that happens, but users need to look at this individual's real motivations. It's silly to argue on couple of words, yet blackburne does it all the time with all other users, his edits must be perfect ofcourse!
good edits like this are vandalism according to blackburne, warning, this guy should never ever become administrator or anythin else: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Thirteenth_Amendment&diff=350672397&oldid=350664877

—Preceding unsigned comment added by Monthandme (talkcontribs) 21:48, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments