Jump to content

User talk:Scray: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Notifying top 5 contributors (using vs.aka-online.de) to article HIV
Line 71: Line 71:
{{talkback|Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Medicine#New_Auscultogram_diagrams|ts=15:43, 9 March 2010 (UTC)}}
{{talkback|Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Medicine#New_Auscultogram_diagrams|ts=15:43, 9 March 2010 (UTC)}}
I created new versions guided by your advise :-) [[user:madhero88|<font color="005F4C"><b>M</b></font><font color="0134B1">aen</font><font color="005F4C"><b>K.</b></font><font color="005F4C"><b>A.</b></font>]][[user_talk:madhero88|<font color="0134B1"><b><sub>Talk</sub></b></font>]] 15:43, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
I created new versions guided by your advise :-) [[user:madhero88|<font color="005F4C"><b>M</b></font><font color="0134B1">aen</font><font color="005F4C"><b>K.</b></font><font color="005F4C"><b>A.</b></font>]][[user_talk:madhero88|<font color="0134B1"><b><sub>Talk</sub></b></font>]] 15:43, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

==Good article reassessment for [[HIV]] ==
[[HIV]] has been nominated for a [[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment|good article reassessment]]. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to [[Wikipedia:What is a good article?|good article quality]]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. Reviewers' concerns are [[Talk:HIV{{#if:2|/GA2}}|here]]. '''[[User:Phoenix_of9|<font color="Red">Phoenix</font>]][[User talk:Phoenix_of9|<font color="Black"> of9</font>]]''' 06:33, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:33, 25 March 2010


User:Keepcalmandcarryon asked for an determination on an edit proposed by User:Ward20 based on the statement made by "a doctor in a court transcript". Whilst this is factually correct, it isn't really the whole truth. The doctor concerned was Dr Jerry Holmburg, PhD, the senior technical advisor for blood policy within the OPHS reading out a prepared statement drafted on behalf of his boss the Assistant Secretary for Health, designated as the Blood Safety Officer and "reviewed throughout the HHS public health services" to CFIDS, the advisory committee convened by the Secretary of Health to advise on CFS policy.

Can I ask you therefore to reconsider your statement on this thread in the light of the true facts. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TerryE (talkcontribs) 21:48, 13 February 2010

Thanks

The Barnstar of Diligence
Thanks for watching Virus and maintaining WP:NPOV and other policies. It's so reassuring to know that you are here. Graham Colm (talk) 21:29, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This is quite meaningful coming from you Graham! Thank you!! -- Scray (talk) 22:01, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This edit on Talk:RD

Thread moved here from my Talk page.

I don't want to extend this on Talk:RD, and I fear that I am misinterpreting your response so I thought I'd ask here. When you used the term "Bullshit", were you referring to my reply? If so, I think it's unfair (and uncivil). The explanation to which you refer is disingenuous: it's not possible to reply on the IP user's talk page, because they shift around from IP to IP. Thus, their complaint that other users have not taken this to User Talk is misdirected - they don't have a user talk page. Furthermore, my reply was not "continued carping"; rather, it was a constructive suggestion for that user meant to help them deliver a more convincing apology. Their failure to sign will remain disruptive, even if all of the current complainants go away. -- Scray (talk) 19:03, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for contacting me. I can't call your post an unending recrimination so my term "Bullshit" cannot apply to it. There is nothing to stop anyone starting User talk:82.43.91.76 by posting a reply. I don't want to say anything more about that IP user who has been asked many times to get over their reluctance to sign. Cuddlyable3 (talk) 21:31, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

(Re: File_talk:Cystic_fibrosis_manifistations.png)

Thank you :-) MaenK.A.Talk 21:39, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry About moving the indentation of the conversation at the file talk page, but I thought that would make the conversation more organised, and can you please tell me how does the indentation relate to the temporal order of the messages, thank you again MaenK.A.Talk 17:18, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I think this page has a nice description of indentation guidelines, but I'm happy to help if that's not clear. -- Scray (talk) 18:03, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much, that was clear, and I got the Idea now, But now I think that I looked stupid doing those indentations lol, anyway thank you again and again for your kindest help MaenK.A.Talk 18:36, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You did not look stupid at all - you work is fantastic, and formatting a Talk page is just a local convention. Best of luck in your studies - I did similar things when I was a medical student (back when there were Bulletin board systems, before the Internet), and learned a great deal in the process. I look forward to further interactions with you - don't ever hesitate to ask a question (can't guarantee I will be able to answer, but I'll try). -- Scray (talk) 18:44, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for wishing me luck, and yea contributing to wikipedia is really fun and beneficial for me, I appreciate your positive encouragement, and I ll be more than happy to work with you again and again, and If I have any questions you will be the one I will ask, enjoy editing MaenK.A.Talk 19:00, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Scray. You have new messages at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Medicine#New_Auscultogram_diagrams.
Message added 15:43, 9 March 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I created new versions guided by your advise :-) MaenK.A.Talk 15:43, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for HIV

HIV has been nominated for a good article reassessment. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to good article quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. Reviewers' concerns are here. Phoenix of9 06:33, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]