Talk:Ghost Whisperer: Difference between revisions
m Signing comment by 121.6.189.143 - "→鬼语者: " |
Lollipopfop (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
:You reported this case at [[WP:AN3]]. If you want admins to take an interest in this case, it would help to explain the logic of your position here. This will allow people to see that you are making a good faith effort. Perhaps [[Special:Contributions/209.244.187.134|209.244.187.134]] will join this discussion to explain why he is reverting. What is the dispute about? [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 15:43, 4 May 2009 (UTC) |
:You reported this case at [[WP:AN3]]. If you want admins to take an interest in this case, it would help to explain the logic of your position here. This will allow people to see that you are making a good faith effort. Perhaps [[Special:Contributions/209.244.187.134|209.244.187.134]] will join this discussion to explain why he is reverting. What is the dispute about? [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 15:43, 4 May 2009 (UTC) |
||
::The user has been constantly reverting edits bavk to sources that are out of date. He also is removind references and putting a made up rating in the US Ratings section. If he could explain why he is doing these things and it seems logical, I could stop reporting and reverting him.[[User:ChaosMaster16|ChaosMaster16]] ([[User talk:ChaosMaster16|talk]]) 11:52, 5 May 2009 (UTC)ChaosMaster16 |
::The user has been constantly reverting edits bavk to sources that are out of date. He also is removind references and putting a made up rating in the US Ratings section. If he could explain why he is doing these things and it seems logical, I could stop reporting and reverting him.[[User:ChaosMaster16|ChaosMaster16]] ([[User talk:ChaosMaster16|talk]]) 11:52, 5 May 2009 (UTC)ChaosMaster16 |
||
I think its safe to say their reason isn't logical. |
|||
I edited the premise to better reflect the show. For example, the concept of sin is not present or ever talked about. All the spirits seek is peace of mind. Also, I added information to the season description. It is a rule of Wikipedia that a summary has to have an ending. It must not exclude information for fear of spoilers! This is not an advertisement to get people interested. Its a description. If someone is afraid of spoilers then it would be foolish of them to read an article about the show. As it is. Im including spoilers. It is not sufficient to say things like "Melinda suffers a major loss". Its more informative to explain that Andrea dies. So does Jim. Of course he comes back. |
|||
== Computer Game. == |
== Computer Game. == |
Revision as of 13:18, 6 April 2010
{{WikiProject banner shell}}
to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.![]() | Television B‑class Mid‑importance | |||||||||
|
Template:Multicol
2009 |
Episode Count on Characters
This shouldn't be included until the series ends and/or a character leaves, not everyone is going to edit it to the actual episode count EVERY WEEK, so some of them are inaccurate! Pic Editor960 (talk) 19:52, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
User 209.244.187.134
User 209.244.187.134 is repeatedly un-referencing matearial for no reason. He is doing no good and I have reported him. ChaosMaster16 (talk) 11:52, 4 May 2009 (UTC)ChaosMaster16
- You reported this case at WP:AN3. If you want admins to take an interest in this case, it would help to explain the logic of your position here. This will allow people to see that you are making a good faith effort. Perhaps 209.244.187.134 will join this discussion to explain why he is reverting. What is the dispute about? EdJohnston (talk) 15:43, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- The user has been constantly reverting edits bavk to sources that are out of date. He also is removind references and putting a made up rating in the US Ratings section. If he could explain why he is doing these things and it seems logical, I could stop reporting and reverting him.ChaosMaster16 (talk) 11:52, 5 May 2009 (UTC)ChaosMaster16
I think its safe to say their reason isn't logical. I edited the premise to better reflect the show. For example, the concept of sin is not present or ever talked about. All the spirits seek is peace of mind. Also, I added information to the season description. It is a rule of Wikipedia that a summary has to have an ending. It must not exclude information for fear of spoilers! This is not an advertisement to get people interested. Its a description. If someone is afraid of spoilers then it would be foolish of them to read an article about the show. As it is. Im including spoilers. It is not sufficient to say things like "Melinda suffers a major loss". Its more informative to explain that Andrea dies. So does Jim. Of course he comes back.
Computer Game.
In July 2009 a deal was finalised to develop a computer game based on Ghost Whisperer. It is not clear yet whether Ms Jennifer Love Hewitt will provide the voice for the game. The developers of the game say they look forward to providing fans of the T.V. show with an opportunity to extend their enjoyment of the programme into the gaming arena. The Game will be on P.C. format initially, and will follow closely the plot of the T.V. series. The game is expected in early 2010.Johnwrd (talk) 02:19, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
Did they fire the writers or what?
First they did the about-face last year with killing Jim and then realizing they better bring him back. Now this year, they've jumped forward 5 years. They have a good thing and they just won't stop playing games with it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.186.36.147 (talk) 14:03, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
Why list Dead Whisper as a movie for this show
There is nothing saying that Dead Whisper has anything to do with the show. It could just have close names thats all. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.226.224.235 (talk) 15:41, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
Is it just me
or is this a blatent ripoff of Bleach dulled down for middle age women. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.188.101.60 (talk) 23:19, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
鬼语者
Erm.. The chinese title 鬼语者 does not mean Ghost Whisperer in its true sense. Rather, it suggests someone (者) who uses ghost (鬼) language (语). However, 者 carries a very broad generalisation and without further context to narrow its meaning, it cannot be assumed that the purpose is always for communication. Maybe someone with a better creativity can come up with a better transliteration of the title. Ghost Language User, anybody?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.6.189.143 (talk) 13:55, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
By the way, I followed the link to the Chinese wikipedia, where there is a chinese version of the article. They named it 灵感应, which means supernatural perception. The link is pasted below for your convenience.
http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E9%9D%88%E6%84%9F%E6%87%89
As a sidenote, having multiple names for the same show is fairly common among chinese speaking regions - hong kong may have one name while taiwan has another name. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.6.189.143 (talk) 14:09, 14 February 2010 (UTC)