User talk:Rdeshmukh

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rdeshmukh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

The wiki page on Rahul Gandhi is full of speculation and alleged corruption that uses articles from pioneer and boloji.com as references. A careful review of the referenced articles shows that the referenced articles show that the articles dont talk of what is being mentioned in the wiki page. The page on Rahul Gandhi is clearly the handiwork of some individual with a biased political POV. Suggest complete rework. I will be posting the edits made by me on this talk page for review.

Decline reason:

I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  • understand what you have been blocked for,
  • will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  • will make useful contributions instead.

Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. TNXMan 02:12, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Rdeshmukh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

The reason given for blocking my ID is rather vaguely put as "blanking". What i have done is edited out the false references that are purely designed to malign an individual. How does one go about editing the page or placing it under review? The article on Rahul Gandhi as it stands is clearly written in a very biased way and thus UNACCEPTABLE. We reserve the right to undertake any further legal action as may be necessary to get this issue resolved.

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=The reason given for blocking my ID is rather vaguely put as "blanking". What i have done is edited out the false references that are purely designed to malign an individual. How does one go about editing the page or placing it under review? The article on Rahul Gandhi as it stands is clearly written in a very biased way and thus UNACCEPTABLE. We reserve the right to undertake any further legal action as may be necessary to get this issue resolved. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=The reason given for blocking my ID is rather vaguely put as "blanking". What i have done is edited out the false references that are purely designed to malign an individual. How does one go about editing the page or placing it under review? The article on Rahul Gandhi as it stands is clearly written in a very biased way and thus UNACCEPTABLE. We reserve the right to undertake any further legal action as may be necessary to get this issue resolved. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=The reason given for blocking my ID is rather vaguely put as "blanking". What i have done is edited out the false references that are purely designed to malign an individual. How does one go about editing the page or placing it under review? The article on Rahul Gandhi as it stands is clearly written in a very biased way and thus UNACCEPTABLE. We reserve the right to undertake any further legal action as may be necessary to get this issue resolved. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}