Jump to content

User talk:Msemeb: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Msemeb (talk | contribs)
Msemeb (talk | contribs)
Line 58: Line 58:


{{helpme}}
{{helpme}}

[[do the people who criticize actually edit?]]
== Do the people who criticize actually edit? ==

It seems no matter what i do to improve the articles I have submitted, they are up for debate or deletion, yet NO ONE is actually helping me to edit. When I asked a friend to help me I got banned for being a Sockpuppet! I'm new to this and didn't know i needed to publicly announce we were using the same internet connection. We were also not given time to defend this claim as the ban was only up for discussion for 12 hours, while we were asleep.
It seems no matter what i do to improve the articles I have submitted, they are up for debate or deletion, yet NO ONE is actually helping me to edit. When I asked a friend to help me I got banned for being a Sockpuppet! I'm new to this and didn't know i needed to publicly announce we were using the same internet connection. We were also not given time to defend this claim as the ban was only up for discussion for 12 hours, while we were asleep.



Revision as of 23:29, 5 May 2010

Welcome!

Hello, Msemeb, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Green smoothie, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard. Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  Blanchardb -MeMyEarsMyMouth- timed 04:15, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Green smoothie has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Only one source that directly relates to the subject. No assertion of notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Blanchardb -MeMyEarsMyMouth- timed 04:15, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

How does X work?

{{helpme}} I do not understand why my article is going to be deleted. Please advice me. I really want to share this information Msemeb (talk) 21:53, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You removed the 'proposed deletion', and that's fine; however, it may later be deleted through a discussion. Currently, it seems to have only primary sources, ie apart from coverage in sites such as .therawdiet.com etc, there is a lack of coverage in independent reliable sources - which is a requirement for notability. The 'references' that you have given all appear to be directly related to the product.  Chzz  ►  22:17, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Green smoothie, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Green smoothie. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.  Chzz  ►  22:27, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for being constructive Msemeb (talk) 21:53, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SPI report

This report directly concerns you.Beyond My Ken (talk) 04:11, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing, for a period of 2 weeks, for abusing multiple accounts. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. TNXMan 19:07, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Victoria Boutenko

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Victoria Boutenko. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victoria Boutenko. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:15, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Do the people who criticize actually edit?

It seems no matter what i do to improve the articles I have submitted, they are up for debate or deletion, yet NO ONE is actually helping me to edit. When I asked a friend to help me I got banned for being a Sockpuppet! I'm new to this and didn't know i needed to publicly announce we were using the same internet connection. We were also not given time to defend this claim as the ban was only up for discussion for 12 hours, while we were asleep.

I need someone with experience to help me edit Green Smoothie and Victoria Boutenko. When I started Wikipedia Victoria Boutenko was already a topic but I was advised to make changes to her information to give more creibiltiy to green smoothie. I'm about to give up - I have spent far too much time researching and defending perfectly creditable subjects (all you have to do is a google news search to see how much information is out there). Assistance would be appreciated. Msemeb (talk) 23:24, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]