User talk:Schierbecker: Difference between revisions
thanks and will proceed on NL page as instructed.; have proceeded on SBS page as allowed. |
→Hi: new section |
||
Line 105: | Line 105: | ||
:I'm certain if there was any discussion about splitting the article into non-lethal and less-lethal there would be rejection by the Wikipedia community. As Peterkingiron pointed out on the categories for discussion page, splitting them up (especially without reliable sources that make that distinction) would be POV. Instead, focus on changing all instances of less-lethal to non-lethal on wikipedia. I removed two of the tags from the Sacred band article you can remove the other if you think you have fixed it.[[User:Marcus Aurelius Antoninus|Marcus Aurelius]] ([[User talk:Marcus Aurelius Antoninus#top|talk]]) 18:06, 11 May 2010 (UTC) |
:I'm certain if there was any discussion about splitting the article into non-lethal and less-lethal there would be rejection by the Wikipedia community. As Peterkingiron pointed out on the categories for discussion page, splitting them up (especially without reliable sources that make that distinction) would be POV. Instead, focus on changing all instances of less-lethal to non-lethal on wikipedia. I removed two of the tags from the Sacred band article you can remove the other if you think you have fixed it.[[User:Marcus Aurelius Antoninus|Marcus Aurelius]] ([[User talk:Marcus Aurelius Antoninus#top|talk]]) 18:06, 11 May 2010 (UTC) |
||
:::Copy that. Will do. Also delted the in-universe page. Firmly believe I have addressed the issue adequately. Guidance is very helpful on N-ls and, of course, everything else. Thanks again. [[User:Harmonia1|Harmonia1]] ([[User talk:Harmonia1|talk]]) 18:58, 11 May 2010 (UTC) |
:::Copy that. Will do. Also delted the in-universe page. Firmly believe I have addressed the issue adequately. Guidance is very helpful on N-ls and, of course, everything else. Thanks again. [[User:Harmonia1|Harmonia1]] ([[User talk:Harmonia1|talk]]) 18:58, 11 May 2010 (UTC) |
||
== Hi == |
|||
Hi Marcus. I have started and ended three previous wikipedia entries. One was called Semasa. One was called dhall10067. And the third was called douglaseivindhall. I plan on keeping the fourth one. Thanks for reminding me about putting references. I do not care what people do with my three previous closed out accounts. I scrambled the passwords. Take care, Doug Hall |
Revision as of 20:38, 11 May 2010
This is Schierbecker's talk page, where you can send her messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 |
File permission problem with File:Pars4x4-01.jpg
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/c/cf/Copyright-problem.svg/64px-Copyright-problem.svg.png)
Thanks for uploading File:Pars4x4-01.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en
wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. DavidDCM (talk) 13:38, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
- Best way to go here is to keep an image of each variant (4x4, 6x6, 8x8) as fair use. Marcus Aurelius Antoninus (talk) 13:44, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
There are images of the vehicle on Commons, they are just of pretty bad quality (bad perspective). Unfortunately I doubt that fair use would apply here. --DavidDCM (talk) 14:22, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
Suggestion
You should try reading The Bible.
This is BellaKazza
That was not vandalizing, That info on the Human page was incorrect and the needed to be corrected.
Why do you keep editing my words out? You try to silence me? Why? God's word is law he is the lord over the nation why do you try to keep his word from being heard.
Marcus you try to silence me because the truth is too strong for you to handle.
God is more immportant then this person you speak of, God has the truth in the Bible.
The Bible is the Standard.
This is Mensa180
Rather than delete my valid page about Dale Adink, why not add something to show that the content is unfinished and others could aid in finishing it? The person and his creation are quite real, google them if you want.
- If you really think this person is notable start an article in your userspace. Marcus Aurelius Antoninus (talk) 21:43, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
Why should your opinion of notable trump mine? The man has started a few sims, Warbirds and AcesHigh are the two most notable. Perhaps I'm a history and aviation geek but AcesHigh has thousands of members and is the premier simulation of it's genre. Because something is a niche does not mean it is insignificant.
The criteria for notability for Creative professionals as listed on Wikipedia:Notability (people):
- The person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by their peers or successors.
- The person is known for originating a significant new concept, theory or technique.
- The person has created, or played a major role in co-creating, a significant or well-known work, or collective body of work, that has been the subject of an independent book or feature-length film, or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews.
- The person's work either (a) has become a significant monument, (b) has been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) has won significant critical attention, or (d) is represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums.
We aren't as selective Britannica but we do have standards. Marcus Aurelius Antoninus (talk) 22:13, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
Mensa tags
I see you have just added a couple of tags to the Mensa International article, but you have not given any specific reasons for these tags. Please could you give them here or on the article talk page so people know what to fix. Stephen B Streater (talk) 08:05, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for fixing it. Stephen B Streater (talk) 21:42, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
Great to see move to Non-lethal
Marcus, happy to see LL more to NL. Great work. Should the categories now be adjusted to reflect the military aspect? Asked you about this also on my talk page Harmonia1 (talk) 23:14, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
Clean-up the paragraph that I've noted that clarification is needed and I'll pass it as GA. You've done a lot of hard work and I'd not like to see it go unrecognized.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 12:51, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks so much for your patience. an edit by Noraft I think clarified the sentence but he/she didn't remove the clarify tag. Marcus Aurelius Antoninus (talk) 20:07, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
File permission problem with File:Pars8x8-01.jpg
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/c/cf/Copyright-problem.svg/64px-Copyright-problem.svg.png)
Thanks for uploading File:Pars8x8-01.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en
wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. DavidDCM (talk) 12:18, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
2010 Times Square car bomb attempt
Marcus did you mean to revert yourself here?--220.101.28.25 (talk) 13:25, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
Certainly not! Marcus Aurelius Antoninus (talk) 13:33, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
April Fool's Day DYK nom
The article will need to be expanded from its current state before it is in a fit state to appear as an April Fool's Day DYK. Mjroots (talk) 07:16, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
OOPS
Think I should take it down? EgoNonBarrus (talk) 18:49, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks, sorry bout that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by EgoNonBarrus (talk • contribs) 18:58, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : L (April 2010)
The April 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:43, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
Thanks again, MAA
Thanks for all your help on the Sacred Band of Stepsons page -- again. Harmonia1 (talk) 22:37, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
Is it ok to work on non-lethal page
Marcus, is it appropriate to work on Non-lethal page or wait until they decide whether to split it onto a non-lethal and a less-lethal page? NL page needs to be reorganized and rewritten if that is the title, since the focus then is broader and more encompassing. Several of us want to work on it, but don't want to do any edits that might be considered destructive if the pages are going to be split: less-lethal people might want to keep some language as it is. Advice? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Harmonia1 (talk • contribs) 17:43, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
- I'm certain if there was any discussion about splitting the article into non-lethal and less-lethal there would be rejection by the Wikipedia community. As Peterkingiron pointed out on the categories for discussion page, splitting them up (especially without reliable sources that make that distinction) would be POV. Instead, focus on changing all instances of less-lethal to non-lethal on wikipedia. I removed two of the tags from the Sacred band article you can remove the other if you think you have fixed it.Marcus Aurelius (talk) 18:06, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
- Copy that. Will do. Also delted the in-universe page. Firmly believe I have addressed the issue adequately. Guidance is very helpful on N-ls and, of course, everything else. Thanks again. Harmonia1 (talk) 18:58, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
Hi
Hi Marcus. I have started and ended three previous wikipedia entries. One was called Semasa. One was called dhall10067. And the third was called douglaseivindhall. I plan on keeping the fourth one. Thanks for reminding me about putting references. I do not care what people do with my three previous closed out accounts. I scrambled the passwords. Take care, Doug Hall