Jump to content

Talk:Alan Solomont: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Off2riorob (talk | contribs)
Line 14: Line 14:


Better? It could use a bit of brightening if it is kept in. Its a bit better imo as you say at least he is lookig face on. [[User:Off2riorob|Off2riorob]] ([[User talk:Off2riorob|talk]]) 15:57, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
Better? It could use a bit of brightening if it is kept in. Its a bit better imo as you say at least he is lookig face on. [[User:Off2riorob|Off2riorob]] ([[User talk:Off2riorob|talk]]) 15:57, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Not great but better indeed! It's a pleasure to deal with you. [[Special:Contributions/89.129.35.98|89.129.35.98]] ([[User talk:89.129.35.98|talk]]) 16:28, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:28, 18 May 2010

WikiProject iconBiography Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconBarack Obama Unassessed (inactive)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Barack Obama, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Picture

That picture is very poor indeed as a representation of this person, he is not even looking at the camera at all, is he a military person or is he strongly associated with the military? The picture asserts to me that he is. I would crop it to center on him but it is just not worth it, picture would be better removed. It clearly should not be in the infobox. Off2riorob (talk) 14:05, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Try this one. It was taken in the same place as the currently published, is pretty dark and -on top of that- it includes a horrible motivational poster, but at least he is looking at the camera.

Better? It could use a bit of brightening if it is kept in. Its a bit better imo as you say at least he is lookig face on. Off2riorob (talk) 15:57, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not great but better indeed! It's a pleasure to deal with you. 89.129.35.98 (talk) 16:28, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]