Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yulia Shisko

Yulia Shisko

Yulia Shisko (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not nearly enough significant coverage seen. —fetch·comms 02:05, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

• Keep Notability due to wide inter-European/ international coverage in the 2010 Eurovision song contests. Also she was a finalist on a TV show. IJA (talk) 02:29, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep this is an obvious keeper. Eurovision notability, plus other musical projects.--ÅlandÖland (talk) 10:59, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
• fair enough but probably premature... many others could be bracketed as having similar claims to fame in the past but would generally now be assessed as not worthy of a Wikipedia article--Stephencdickson (talk) 12:27, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

well that isn just pure speculation and not anything we can take a stand in right now... so keep the article for future evaluation. Especially in the light that the group could win Eurovision or get notable fame after eurovision.--ÅlandÖland (talk) 14:11, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:54, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Belarus-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:55, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
• Delete: Sure, Eurovision song contests has notability, and the formation 3+2 may also, but I don't see anything for Yulia Shisko alone. Dewritech (talk) 08:29, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

I really dont understand you reasons.. if being in Eurovision is notable and being a member of 3+2 is notable...then how can Yulia Shisko as a person Not be notable?. By the way one of the other members has already been Not deleted so deleting this one on grounds of non-notability doesnt work.--ÅlandÖland (talk) 14:11, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

There are no valid sources for Yulia Shisko alone. Being a member of 3+2 doesn't justify a seperate article. Dewritech (talk) 15:42, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Yes it does if you implying that being a member of 3+2 and being part of Eurovision is notable. As Yulia is part of both these two notable subjects.--ÅlandÖland (talk) 00:10, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

We cant neither say as of this moment that Yulia wont get alot of attention after the Eurovision final tomorrow. Perhaps get a solo career et.c Or that 3+2 becomes a huge popular group or even wins the Eurovision. She will get alot more internet matches soon after eurovision. And to say that a person who has singed infront of an audience that could be up to 500 million people isnt notable.. is just wrong. To delete this article is not right. I rest my case.--ÅlandÖland (talk) 00:21, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

• Keep per notability. eurovision. own career. etc.etc--195.84.41.1 (talk) 06:00, 2 June 2010 (UTC)